Literature DB >> 9670177

Prospective evaluation of new and old criteria to discriminate between supraventricular and ventricular tachycardia in implantable defibrillators.

H S Barold1, K H Newby, G Tomassoni, M Kearney, J Brandon, A Natale.   

Abstract

This study was designed to evaluate the ability to distinguish between supraventricular tachycardias (SVTs) and ventricular tachycardias (VTs) based on onset, stability, and width criteria in an implantable defibrillator. Inappropriate detection of atrial fibrillation and sinus tachycardia is a common problem in patients with implantable defibrillators. The onset, stability, and width criteria were studied in 17 patients who underwent implantation of a Medtronic 7218C implantable defibrillator by inducing sinus tachycardia and atrial fibrillation. Additional data on the width criteria was obtained by pacing at separate sites in both the left and right ventricle. Patients were studied at different times for up to 6 months to determine any changes in the criteria. The onset and stability criteria caused inappropriate detections in 36% and 12% of the episodes, respectively. The addition of the width criteria decreased the inappropriate detection using the onset and stability criteria to 5% and 2%, respectively. Pacing from the RV apex, RV outflow tract, and LV apex was appropriately detected as wide in 76%, 41%, and 94%, respectively. The width criteria changed over time in individual patients, but was stable by 6 months in all but one patient. No single criterion is satisfactory for distinguishing between SVT and VT in this patient population, but the combination of criteria seems to provide better discrimination. The width criteria can change dramatically over time and needs to be monitored carefully. Newer algorithms will need to be developed to allow better detection of supraventricular tachycardias.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9670177     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1998.tb00204.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  4 in total

Review 1.  Implantable dual-chamber cardioverter-defibrillator-pacemaker.

Authors:  D Pfeiffer; M Mende; A Hagendorff
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  A pilot study examining the performance of polynomial-modeled ventricular shock electrograms for rhythm discrimination in implantable devices.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Williams; Vladimir Shusterman; Samir Saba
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.976

3.  A segmental polynomial model of ventricular electrograms as a simple and efficient morphology discriminator for implantable devices.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Williams; Vladimir Shusterman; Samir Saba
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.468

4.  Selecting dual chamber or single chamber implantable defibrillators: what is the golden rule?

Authors:  Massimo Santini; Renato Ricci
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2003-10-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.