Literature DB >> 9669827

A study on the clinical equivalence and patient preference of fluticasone propionate 250 microg twice daily via the Diskus/Accuhaler inhaler or the Diskhaler inhaler in adult asthmatic patients.

W R Pieters1, R A Stallaert, J Prins, A P Greefhorst, H G Bosman, R van Uffelen, A J Schreurs, J L van Helmond, P G Janssen.   

Abstract

The Diskus/Accuhaler inhaler (D/A) is a new multidose powder inhaler, designed to deliver all asthma drugs. This study was carried out to establish clinical equivalence between FP 250 microg twice daily (b.i.d.) via the D/A and FP 250 microg b.i.d. via the current powder inhaler, the Diskhaler (DH). Also, device handling and patient preference for both devices were determined. This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study. Adult asthmatics (364, aged 18-79) requiring inhaled corticosteroids in a daily dosage of 400 microg up to and including 1000 microg and demonstrating a mean morning peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) calculated from the last 7 days of the run-in of less than 85% of the response after salbutamol, a baseline forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) between 50 and 90% of their predicted normal value, and an ability to correctly use both devices, were randomized to a 12-week treatment period. No statistically significant differences between the two devices were seen for mean morning PEFR (p = 0.76), mean evening PEFR (p = 0.88), median daytime and nighttime symptom score (p = 0.57 and p = 0.47), median percentage of rescue-free days and nights (p = 0.43 and p = 0.24), and clinic visit lung function. No differences in the safety profile of FP were seen. Patients found the D/A easier to use and easier with respect to assessing the number of doses remaining (both p < 0.001). Sixty-five percent of the patients expressed an overall preference for the D/A over the DH (p < 0.001). The results show that FP 250 microg b.i.d. via the D/A is clinically equivalent to delivery via the DH. Both treatments proved to be equally safe and were well tolerated. The D/A was easier to use and patients preferred the D/A over the DH.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9669827     DOI: 10.3109/02770909809075666

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Asthma        ISSN: 0277-0903            Impact factor:   2.515


  6 in total

Review 1.  Inhaled fluticasone propionate: a review of its therapeutic efficacy at dosages < or = 500 microg/day in adults and adolescents with mild to moderate asthma.

Authors:  B Jarvis; D Faulds
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Fluticasone at different doses for chronic asthma in adults and children.

Authors:  Nick P Adams; Janine C Bestall; Paul Jones; Toby J Lasserson; Benedict Griffiths; Christopher J Cates
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-10-08

3.  Time course of action of two inhaled corticosteroids, fluticasone propionate and budesonide.

Authors:  K Phillips; J Oborne; S Lewis; T W Harrison; A E Tattersfield
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 4.  Inhaled salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in the management of asthma.

Authors:  Katherine A Lyseng-Williamson; Greg L Plosker
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  Adolescent treatment compliance in asthma.

Authors:  R Dinwiddie; W G Müller
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 18.000

6.  Ease of use of the ELLIPTA dry powder inhaler: data from three randomised controlled trials in patients with asthma.

Authors:  Henrik Svedsater; Loretta Jacques; Caroline Goldfrad; Eugene R Bleecker
Journal:  NPJ Prim Care Respir Med       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 2.871

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.