Literature DB >> 9668742

What determines quality in maternity care? Comparing the perceptions of childbearing women and midwives.

S Proctor1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the current climate of consumer orientation in health care services, a clear need has emerged to understand the extent of consumer focus among primary health care professionals. Few studies have compared the beliefs of health care staff with those of patients. This study sought to identify and compare the perceptions of women and midwives concerning women's beliefs about what constitutes quality in maternity services.
METHODS: Focus groups were conducted from July 1994 to June 1997 with 38 pregnant and postnatal women, and 47 midwives who were based in two large maternity units in Yorkshire, England. Transcriptions of data were analyzed to identify broad themes.
RESULTS: Ten dimensions of quality were identified. Similarities between midwives and women included beliefs about the importance of the relationship between the two parties, desired attributes of staff, and the environment of care. Key differences included underestimating the importance of information antenatally and postnatally, the importance of continuity during labor, need for control and confidence in adjusting to the maternal role, and involvement of the woman's partner in the delivery of care.
CONCLUSIONS: An understanding of the concerns of women by maternity care staff is important in the development of a woman-focused service, in line with current policy recommendations, and has implications for risk management and improving the service quality for those who provide and experience the service.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9668742     DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-536x.1998.00085.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Birth        ISSN: 0730-7659            Impact factor:   3.689


  21 in total

1.  Routine examination of the newborn and maternal satisfaction: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  D Wolke; S Dave; J Hayes; J Townsend; M Tomlin
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.747

2.  Pregnancy planning guide. Evidence-based information for prospective parents.

Authors:  Krista M Maier; Colleen M Kirkham; Elizabeth Lim; Ka Wai Cheung; Stefan Grzybowski
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Midwifery care: reflections of midwifery clients.

Authors:  Mary Ellen Doherty
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2010

4.  Postnatal care: development of a psychometric multidimensional satisfaction questionnaire (the WOMBPNSQ) to assess women's views.

Authors:  Lindsay F P Smith
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Qualitative study of evidence based leaflets in maternity care.

Authors:  Helen Stapleton; Mavis Kirkham; Gwenan Thomas
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-03-16

6.  Women's experiences of infant feeding support in the first 6 weeks post-birth.

Authors:  Athena Sheehan; Virginia Schmied; Lesley Barclay
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.092

7.  Childbirth expectations and sources of information among low- and moderate-income nulliparous pregnant women.

Authors:  Deanna K Martin; Sandra M Bulmer; Christian M Pettker
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2013

8.  The experience of perinatal care at a birthing center: a qualitative pilot study.

Authors:  Amber T Pewitt
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2008

Review 9.  Women's experience of prenatal care: an integrative review.

Authors:  Gina Novick
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.388

Review 10.  Strengthening Antenatal Care towards a Salutogenic Approach: A Meta-Ethnography.

Authors:  Kristiina Heinonen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.