Literature DB >> 9667673

Cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and infusional 5-fluorouracil (infusional CMF) in metastatic breast cancer.

K J O'Byrne1, M I Koukourakis, M P Saunders, A J Salisbury, R Isaacs, S Varcoe, M Taylor, T S Ganesan, A L Harris, D C Talbot.   

Abstract

Bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is a phase-specific drug with a short plasma half-life that is used in combination with bolus cyclophosphamide and methotrexate in the treatment of breast cancer. The efficacy of 5-FU can be improved by continuous intravenous infusion using portable infusion pumps (infusional 5-FU). Infusional 5-FU, 200 mg m(-2) day(-1), in combination with standard doses of bolus cyclophosphamide and methotrexate, was evaluated in a phase I/II dose-finding study. The cyclophosphamide and methotrexate were administered in 28-day cycles as follows: cohort 1, cyclophosphamide 600 mg m(-2), days 1 and 8, and methotrexate 40 mg m(-2), day 1; cohort 2, cyclophosphamide 400 mg m(-2), days 1 and 8, and methotrexate 40 mg m(-2), day 1; cohort 3, cyclophosphamide 480 mg (m-2), days 1 and 8, and methotrexate 40 mg m(-2), day 1; cohort 4, cyclophosphamide 480 mg m(-2), days 1 and 8, and methotrexate 40 mg m(-2), days 1 and 8. Median overall survival was 10 months (range 3-21 months). Objective tumour responses were seen in 9 of 25 patients (36%, 95% CI 18-58%), including 3 of 13 patients (23%) previously treated for metastatic disease. Cohorts 1 and 4 proved to be too toxic, with five of six patients in cohort 1 and three of four in cohort 4 developing grade III/IV neutropenia. The dose intensity of cyclophosphamide achieved was as follows: cohort 1, 82%; cohort 2, 86%; cohort 3, 97%; cohort 4, 90%. Infusional 5-FU can be administered safely and is effective in combination with cyclophosphamide 480 mg m(-2), days 1 and 8, and methotrexate 40 mg m(-2), day 1, in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9667673      PMCID: PMC2150339          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1998.323

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  30 in total

1.  Interim Analysis of a Phase II study of epirubicin and paclitaxel as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  H J Luck; C Thomssen; A duBois; B W Lisboa; M Untch; H Kuhnle; G Konecny; F Janicke; H G Meerpohl; C Lindner; D Hecker; K Diergarten
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.929

2.  A pilot study of infusional CMF (CMF-inf): active and well tolerated in breast cancer. The Edinburgh Breast Group.

Authors:  J Mackay; D A Cameron; J Gardiner; T Leonard; L E Lee; R C Leonard
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  Primary medical (neo-adjuvant) chemotherapy for operable breast cancer.

Authors:  I E Smith; A L Jones; M E O'Brien; J A McKinna; N Sacks; M Baum
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 4.  Preclinical and clinical aspects of biomodulation of 5-fluorouracil.

Authors:  G A Sotos; L Grogan; C J Allegra
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 12.111

5.  Fluorouracil therapy in patients with carcinoma of the large bowel: a pharmacokinetic comparison of various rates and routes of administration.

Authors:  N Chirstophidis; F J Vajda; I Lucas; O Drummer; W J Moon; W J Louis
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1978 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  A comparison of patient-reported side effects among three chemotherapy regimens for breast cancer.

Authors:  D Greene; L M Nail; V K Fieler; D Dudgeon; L S Jones
Journal:  Cancer Pract       Date:  1994 Jan-Feb

7.  High complete remission rates with primary neoadjuvant infusional chemotherapy for large early breast cancer.

Authors:  I E Smith; G Walsh; A Jones; J Prendiville; S Johnston; B Gusterson; F Ramage; H Robertshaw; N Sacks; S Ebbs
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 8.  Treatment of metastatic breast cancer: present and future prospects.

Authors:  D F Hayes; I C Henderson; C L Shapiro
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.929

9.  Complications of indwelling venous access devices in cancer patients.

Authors:  B J Eastridge; A T Lefor
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 10.  The role of taxanes in the treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  G Capri; E Tarenzi; F Fulfaro; L Gianni
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.929

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Rechallenging with anthracyclines and taxanes in metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Carlo Palmieri; Jonathan Krell; Colin R James; Catherine Harper-Wynne; Vivek Misra; Susan Cleator; David Miles
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Comparison of prognostic factors in patients in phase I trials of cytotoxic drugs vs new noncytotoxic agents.

Authors:  C Han; J P Braybrooke; G Deplanque; M Taylor; D Mackintosh; K Kaur; K Samouri; T S Ganesan; A L Harris; D C Talbot
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-10-06       Impact factor: 7.640

3.  A single-center, randomized, parallel controlled study comparing the efficacy and safety aspects of three anthracycline-based regimens as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in primary breast cancer.

Authors:  Yijun Zhou; Tao Ouyang; Yuntao Xie; Tianfeng Wang; Zhaoqing Fan; Yingjian He; Aiping Lu; Yiqiang Liu; Jinfeng Li
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 4.872

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.