Literature DB >> 9667644

Magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy of combretastatin A4 prodrug-induced disruption of tumour perfusion and energetic status.

D A Beauregard1, P E Thelwall, D J Chaplin, S A Hill, G E Adams, K M Brindle.   

Abstract

The effects of combretastatin A4 prodrug on perfusion and the levels of 31P metabolites in an implanted murine tumour were investigated for 3 h after drug treatment using nuclear magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and spectroscopy (MRS). The area of regions of low signal intensity in spin-echo images of tumours increased slightly after treatment with the drug. These regions of low signal intensity corresponded to necrosis seen in histological sections, whereas the expanding regions surrounding them corresponded to haemorrhage. Tumour perfusion was assessed before and 160 min after drug treatment using dynamic MRI measurements of gadolinium diethylenetriaminepentaacetate (GdDTPA) uptake and washout. Perfusion decreased significantly in central regions of the tumour after treatment. This was attributed to disruption of the vasculature and was consistent with the haemorrhage seen in histological sections. The mean apparent diffusion coefficient of water within the tumour did not change, indicating that there was no expansion of necrotic regions during the 3 h after drug treatment. Localized 31P-MRS showed that there was decline in cellular energy status in the tumour after treatment with the drug. The concentrations of nucleoside triphosphates within the tumour fell, the inorganic phosphate concentration increased and there was a significant decrease in tumour pH for 80 min after drug treatment. The rapid, selective and extensive damage caused to these tumours by combretastatin A4 prodrug has highlighted the potential of the agent as a novel cancer chemotherapeutic agent. We have shown that the response of tumours to treatment with the drug may be monitored non-invasively using MRI and MRS experiments that are appropriate for use in a clinical setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9667644      PMCID: PMC2150333          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1998.294

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  17 in total

1.  Iteration of hybridoma growth and productivity in hollow fiber bioreactors using 31P NMR.

Authors:  R J Gillies; P G Scherer; N Raghunand; L S Okerlund; R Martinez-Zaguilan; L Hesterberg; B E Dale
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Isolation and structure of the strong cell growth and tubulin inhibitor combretastatin A-4.

Authors:  G R Pettit; S B Singh; E Hamel; C M Lin; D S Alberts; D Garcia-Kendall
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1989-02-15

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging of stationary blood: a review.

Authors:  R A Brooks; G Di Chiro
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1987 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Observation of tissue metabolites using 31P nuclear magnetic resonance.

Authors:  D I Hoult; S J Busby; D G Gadian; G K Radda; R E Richards; P J Seeley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1974-11-22       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Bioenergetics of intact human muscle. A 31P nuclear magnetic resonance study.

Authors:  D J Taylor; P J Bore; P Styles; D G Gadian; G K Radda
Journal:  Mol Biol Med       Date:  1983-07

6.  Combretastatin A-4, an agent that displays potent and selective toxicity toward tumor vasculature.

Authors:  G G Dark; S A Hill; V E Prise; G M Tozer; G R Pettit; D J Chaplin
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1997-05-15       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 7.  Response of solid tumors to chemotherapy monitored by in vivo 31P nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy: a review.

Authors:  R G Steen
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1989-08-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 8.  Studies of human tumors by MRS: a review.

Authors:  W Negendank
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  1992 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.044

9.  An assessment of 31P MRS as a method of measuring pH in rat tumours.

Authors:  M Stubbs; Z M Bhujwalla; G M Tozer; L M Rodrigues; R J Maxwell; R Morgan; F A Howe; J R Griffiths
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 10.  The contribution made by cell death and oxygenation to 31P MRS observations of tumour energy metabolism.

Authors:  G M Tozer; J R Griffiths
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  1992 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.044

View more
  22 in total

Review 1.  Applications of magnetic resonance in model systems: cancer therapeutics.

Authors:  J L Evelhoch; R J Gillies; G S Karczmar; J A Koutcher; R J Maxwell; O Nalcioglu; N Raghunand; S M Ronen; B D Ross; H M Swartz
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2000 Jan-Apr       Impact factor: 5.715

2.  Multiparametric MRI biomarkers for measuring vascular disrupting effect on cancer.

Authors:  Huaijun Wang; Guy Marchal; Yicheng Ni
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2011-01-28

3.  Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging allows noninvasive in vivo monitoring of the effects of combretastatin a-4 phosphate after repeated administration.

Authors:  Harriet C Thoeny; Frederik De Keyzer; Feng Chen; Vincent Vandecaveye; Erik K Verbeken; Bisan Ahmed; Xihe Sun; Yicheng Ni; Hilde Bosmans; Robert Hermans; Allan van Oosterom; Guy Marchal; Willy Landuyt
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.715

4.  The Use of Alternative Strategies for Enhanced Nanoparticle Delivery to Solid Tumors.

Authors:  Mukaddes Izci; Christy Maksoudian; Bella B Manshian; Stefaan J Soenen
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 5.  Microtubule-binding agents: a dynamic field of cancer therapeutics.

Authors:  Charles Dumontet; Mary Ann Jordan
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 6.  Promise and progress for functional and molecular imaging of response to targeted therapies.

Authors:  Renu M Stephen; Robert J Gillies
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2007-03-24       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 7.  Magnetic resonance imaging: a potential tool in assessing the addition of hyperthermia to neoadjuvant therapy in patients with locally advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Oana I Craciunescu; Donald E Thrall; Zeljko Vujaskovic; Mark W Dewhirst
Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.914

Review 8.  A review and update of the current status of the vasculature-disabling agent combretastatin-A4 phosphate (CA4P).

Authors:  Dietmar W Siemann; David J Chaplin; Patricia A Walicke
Journal:  Expert Opin Investig Drugs       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 6.206

9.  Anti-tumor activity and mechanisms of a novel vascular disrupting agent, (Z)-3,4',5-trimethoxylstilbene-3'-O-phosphate disodium (M410).

Authors:  Yu-Chen Cai; Yong Zou; Yan-Li Ye; Hong-Yi Sun; Quan-Guan Su; Zhi-Xin Wang; Zhao-Lei Zeng; Li-Jian Xian
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 10.  The biology of the combretastatins as tumour vascular targeting agents.

Authors:  Gillian M Tozer; Chryso Kanthou; Charles S Parkins; Sally A Hill
Journal:  Int J Exp Pathol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 1.925

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.