Literature DB >> 9667147

Oral stereognosis: a review of the literature.

R Jacobs1, C Bou Serhal, D van Steenberghe.   

Abstract

Stereognosis is the ability to recognise and discriminate forms. Oral stereognostic ability has been studied in different reports. The experimental design of the test is of primary importance as both the method used and the material applied may influence the results dramatically. The form, size and surface characteristics of the test piece, the presentation order, subject-related factors and the method of scoring all have their effect on the results. With regard to subject-related factors, ageing has a negative influence on stereognostic ability; gender is considered of no importance. Another influencing factor is dental status. A healthy natural dentition offers a very good oral stereognostic ability. Edentulous subjects usually show a decreased oral stereognostic ability, depending on the rehabilitation form. A number of questions have been addressed, especially with regard to the perception itself. Receptors mainly involved in oral stereognostic ability are located in various oral structures and form perception results from an association of more than one group of receptors. The following review tries to deal with these questions and attempts to provide clear guidelines for further research on oral stereognosis.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9667147     DOI: 10.1007/s007840050035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  20 in total

1.  Evaluation of the Erosive Potential of Various Pediatric Liquid Medicaments: An in-vitro Study.

Authors:  Abhinaya Reddy Tupalli; B Satish; Bharath Raj Shetty; Someshwar Battu; J Phani Kumar; B Nagaraju
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2014-02-26

2.  Evaluation of oral stereognostic ability after rehabilitating patients with complete dentures: in vivo study.

Authors:  S Meenakshi; Anil Kumar Gujjari; H N Thippeswamy; N Raghunath
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2013-11-17

3.  Lingual tactile sensitivity: effect of age group, sex, and fungiform papillae density.

Authors:  Ronald G Bangcuyo; Christopher T Simons
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Measuring oral sensitivity in clinical practice: a quick and reliable behavioural method.

Authors:  Terence M Dovey; Victoria K Aldridge; Clarissa I Martin
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 3.438

5.  Individual predictors of response to biofeedback training for second-language production.

Authors:  Joanne Jingwen Li; Samantha Ayala; Daphna Harel; Douglas M Shiller; Tara McAllister
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Lingual tactile acuity and food texture preferences among children and their mothers.

Authors:  Laura D Lukasewycz; Julie A Mennella
Journal:  Food Qual Prefer       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 5.565

7.  Toward an index of oral somatosensory acuity: Comparison of three measures in adults.

Authors:  Olesia Gritsyk; Heather Kabakoff; Joanne Jingwen Li; Samantha Ayala; Douglas M Shiller; Tara McAllister
Journal:  Perspect ASHA Spec Interest Groups       Date:  2021-03-30

8.  Impact of cognitive function on oral perception in independently living older people.

Authors:  Motoyoshi Fukutake; Taiji Ogawa; Kazunori Ikebe; Yusuke Mihara; Chisato Inomata; Hajime Takeshita; Kenichi Matsuda; Kodai Hatta; Yasuyuki Gondo; Yukie Masui; Hiroki Inagaki; Yasumichi Arai; Kei Kamide; Tatsuro Ishizaki; Yoshinobu Maeda
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Activation of Prefrontal Cortex in Process of Oral and Finger Shape Discrimination: fNIRS Study.

Authors:  Noriyuki Narita; Kazunobu Kamiya; Sunao Iwaki; Tomohiro Ishii; Hiroshi Endo; Michiharu Shimosaka; Takeshi Uchida; Ikuo Kantake; Koh Shibutani
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Visualizing 3D imagery by mouth using candy-like models.

Authors:  Katelyn M Baumer; Juan J Lopez; Surabi V Naidu; Sanjana Rajendran; Miguel A Iglesias; Kathleen M Carleton; Cheyanne J Eisenmann; Lillian R Carter; Bryan F Shaw
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 14.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.