Literature DB >> 9666238

Instrumental and normative motives for compliance with traffic laws among young and older drivers.

D Yagil1.   

Abstract

The study compares young and older drivers' motives for compliance with traffic laws. Instrumental motives, such as perceived danger of violations, and normative motives, such as a sense of obligation to obey the law, were explored. A questionnaire was administered to 693 male drivers in the Israeli army. The results support previous findings, showing that young drivers' motives for compliance with traffic laws, both instrumental and normative, are weaker than those of older drivers. The differences between the two age groups are larger with regard to normative than to instrumental motives. The commission of traffic violations by young drivers is predicted by the normative motives of a sense of obligation to obey traffic laws and perceived fairness of punishment. The commission of driving violation by older drivers is predicted by the instrumental motive of perceived danger of violations. The differences between young and older drivers' motives are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9666238     DOI: 10.1016/s0001-4575(98)00003-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Accid Anal Prev        ISSN: 0001-4575


  5 in total

1.  Analysis of non-compliance with smoke-free legislation in Russia.

Authors:  Liudmila Zasimova
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 3.380

Review 2.  Factors Contributing to Crashes among Young Drivers.

Authors:  Lyndel J Bates; Jeremy Davey; Barry Watson; Mark J King; Kerry Armstrong
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2014-07-24

3.  The association between a statewide stay-at-home order and motor vehicle injury rates among population sub-groups in West Virginia.

Authors:  Toni M Rudisill
Journal:  Traffic Inj Prev       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 2.183

4.  Hand-held cell phone use while driving legislation and observed driver behavior among population sub-groups in the United States.

Authors:  Toni M Rudisill; Motao Zhu
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Evaluating the impact of an injury prevention measure regarding different sociodemographic factors.

Authors:  Thomas Brockamp; Paola Koenen; Manuel Mutschler; Michael Köhler; Bertil Bouillon; Uli Schmucker; Michael Caspers; Working Group Injury Prevention Of The German Trauma Society
Journal:  J Inj Violence Res       Date:  2017-12-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.