Literature DB >> 9665965

Interpretations of antibody responses to Salmonella enterica serotype enteritidis gm flagellin in poultry flocks are enhanced by a kinetics-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

P L McDonough1, R H Jacobson, J F Timoney, A Mutalib, D C Kradel, Y F Chang, S J Shin, D H Lein, S Trock, K Wheeler.   

Abstract

Many regulatory and diagnostic programs for the detection of Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis infection in commercial poultry flocks have relied on rapid Pullorum agglutination tests to screen birds because of the shared antigens of S. enterica Enteritidis and S. enterica Pullorum and Gallinarum; however, the use of the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) format affords better analytical sensitivity than crude agglutination tests. In this study, we adapted our earlier conventional indirect ELISA, using gm flagellin as the antigen, to a kinetics-based, computer-controlled ELISA (KELA). The KELA was used to screen for flagellin antibody from three commercial flocks: (i) a large flock involved in a U.S. Department of Agriculture trace back from a human S. enterica Enteritidis foodborne outbreak (n = 3,209), (ii) a flock infected with the endemic S. enterica Enteritidis serotype but which also had multiple other Salmonella serotypes (n = 65), and (iii) an S. enterica Pullorum-infected flock (n = 12). The first flock (S. enterica Enteritidis prevalence of 2.45% based on culture) provided a field test of the KELA and allowed the calculation of diagnostic sensitivity (D-Sn) and diagnostic specificity (D-Sp). With a cutoff of 10 (used for screening flocks [i.e., high sensitivity]), the KELA has a D-Sn of 95.2% and a D-Sp of 18.5%; with a cutoff of 140 (used in confirmatory flock testing [i.e., high specificity]), the KELA has a D-Sn of 28.0% and a D-Sp of 99.1%. We found that with a cutoff of 60 (D-Sn = 63.1%; D-Sp = 91.6%), we could eliminate reactions in the KELA caused by other non-S. enterica Enteritidis salmonellae. The KELA was also compared to two commercial rapid Pullorum tests, the Solvay (D-Sn = 94.9%; D-Sp = 55.5%) and the Vineland (D-Sn = 62.0%; D-Sp = 75.3%).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9665965      PMCID: PMC95616          DOI: 10.1128/CDLI.5.4.550-555.1998

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Diagn Lab Immunol        ISSN: 1071-412X


  34 in total

1.  Serological tests for Salmonella enteritidis in chickens.

Authors:  H Chart; B Rowe; A Baskerville; T J Humphrey
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  1990-01-27       Impact factor: 2.695

2.  World Health Organisation--supervised interlaboratory comparison of ELISAs for the serological detection of Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis in chickens.

Authors:  P A Barrow; M Desmidt; R Ducatelle; M Guittet; H M van der Heijden; P S Holt; J H Huis in't Velt; P McDonough; K V Nagaraja; R E Porter; K Proux; F Sisak; C Staak; G Steinbach; C J Thorns; C Wray; F van Zijderveld
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.451

3.  Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4.

Authors:  U K Laemmli
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1970-08-15       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Alternative antigens reduce cross-reactions in an ELISA for the detection of Salmonella enteritidis in poultry.

Authors:  M F Baay; J H Huis in 't Veld
Journal:  J Appl Bacteriol       Date:  1993-03

5.  Experimental Lyme disease in dogs produces arthritis and persistent infection.

Authors:  M J Appel; S Allan; R H Jacobson; T L Lauderdale; Y F Chang; S J Shin; J W Thomford; R J Todhunter; B A Summers
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 5.226

6.  Experimental infection of egg-laying hens with Salmonella enteritidis phage type 4.

Authors:  P A Barrow; M A Lovell
Journal:  Avian Pathol       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.378

7.  Experimental infection of chickens with Salmonella enteritidis.

Authors:  P A Barrow
Journal:  Avian Pathol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 3.378

8.  The emergence of grade A eggs as a major source of Salmonella enteritidis infections. New implications for the control of salmonellosis.

Authors:  M E St Louis; D L Morse; M E Potter; T M DeMelfi; J J Guzewich; R V Tauxe; P A Blake
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-04-08       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Salmonella enteritidis and other Salmonella in laying hens and eggs from flocks with Salmonella in their environment.

Authors:  C Poppe; R P Johnson; C M Forsberg; R J Irwin
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 1.310

10.  Development and application of an ELISA for detecting antibodies to Salmonella enteritidis in chicken flocks.

Authors:  R A Nicholas; G A Cullen
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  1991-01-26       Impact factor: 2.695

View more
  1 in total

1.  Sensitive and rapid immunoassays for Salmonella enteritidis.

Authors:  J L Liu; C E Benson; D S Munro; B Wolf
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.352

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.