OBJECTIVE: To identify factors that may increase the risk of a sexually victimised adolescent boy developing sexually abusive behaviour. DESIGN: Sexually victimised boys who had sexually abused other children were compared with sexually victimised boys who had not done so. SETTING: Social services departments in south east England were invited to refer sexually abused and sexually abusing boys to a London postgraduate teaching hospital. SUBJECTS: 25 adolescent boys aged between 11 years and 15 years and 11 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Adjusted odds ratios estimated from unconditional logistic regression. RESULTS: Unadjusted odds rations for witnessing (8.1) as well as experiencing (18.0) intrafamilial violence and discontinuity of care (7.2) discriminated boys who had sexually abused from others who were solely victims of sexual abuse. Only the adjusted odds ratios for witnessing intrafamilial violence (39.7) discriminated the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of adolescent boys who have been victims of sexual abuse engaging in sexually abusive behaviour towards other children is increased by life circumstances which may be unrelated directly to the original abusive experience, in particular exposure to a climate of intrafamilial violence. Our findings have implications for the management of boys found to have been sexually abused and raise important questions about the possibility of secondary prevention of subsequent abusive behaviour in those at greatest risk.
OBJECTIVE: To identify factors that may increase the risk of a sexually victimised adolescent boy developing sexually abusive behaviour. DESIGN: Sexually victimised boys who had sexually abused other children were compared with sexually victimised boys who had not done so. SETTING: Social services departments in south east England were invited to refer sexually abused and sexually abusing boys to a London postgraduate teaching hospital. SUBJECTS: 25 adolescent boys aged between 11 years and 15 years and 11 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Adjusted odds ratios estimated from unconditional logistic regression. RESULTS: Unadjusted odds rations for witnessing (8.1) as well as experiencing (18.0) intrafamilial violence and discontinuity of care (7.2) discriminated boys who had sexually abused from others who were solely victims of sexual abuse. Only the adjusted odds ratios for witnessing intrafamilial violence (39.7) discriminated the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of adolescent boys who have been victims of sexual abuse engaging in sexually abusive behaviour towards other children is increased by life circumstances which may be unrelated directly to the original abusive experience, in particular exposure to a climate of intrafamilial violence. Our findings have implications for the management of boys found to have been sexually abused and raise important questions about the possibility of secondary prevention of subsequent abusive behaviour in those at greatest risk.
Authors: Geraldine Macdonald; Julian P T Higgins; Paul Ramchandani; Jeffrey C Valentine; Latricia P Bronger; Paul Klein; Roland O'Daniel; Mark Pickering; Ben Rademaker; George Richardson; Matthew Taylor Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2012-05-16