Literature DB >> 9665746

Unsolved problems in comparing brain sizes in Homo sapiens.

M Peters1, L Jäncke, J F Staiger, G Schlaug, Y Huang, H Steinmetz.   

Abstract

When brain size is compared across taxonomic levels, there is a clear relation between body parameters and brain size. It is generally stated that the correlation between brain size and body parameters becomes very small at the species level (Aboitiz, 1996), but this is not the case for Homo sapiens where there is a strong correlation between brain size and body size across racial groups that differ in body size. The control for body size across racial groups (and sexes) is rendered difficult because bodies do not just differ only in height and weight. Within groups different studies show weak and inconsistent brain size/body height correlations. A better understanding of brain size/body height relations must await better quality data and a better understanding of how exactly body parameters should be scaled between groups and sexes. We attribute the clear between-group and weak within-group correlations to the large variety of body sizes and body types in our species, a variety which is only equalled in selectively bred species of animals. At present, there is no meaningful basis for the comparison of brain sizes within and between racial groups and sexes. Copyright 1998 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9665746     DOI: 10.1006/brcg.1998.0983

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Cogn        ISSN: 0278-2626            Impact factor:   2.310


  23 in total

Review 1.  [Mrt-based morphometry. A current assessment].

Authors:  M Tittgemeyer; D Y von Cramon
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.214

2.  Sex differences in cortical thickness mapped in 176 healthy individuals between 7 and 87 years of age.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Sowell; Bradley S Peterson; Eric Kan; Roger P Woods; June Yoshii; Ravi Bansal; Dongrong Xu; Hongtu Zhu; Paul M Thompson; Arthur W Toga
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2006-08-31       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Differences between brain mass and body weight scaling to height: potential mechanism of reduced mass-specific resting energy expenditure of taller adults.

Authors:  Steven B Heymsfield; Thamrong Chirachariyavej; Im Joo Rhyu; Chulaporn Roongpisuthipong; Moonseong Heo; Angelo Pietrobelli
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2008-11-13

4.  Automated identification of neurons and their locations.

Authors:  A Inglis; L Cruz; D L Roe; H E Stanley; D L Rosene; B Urbanc
Journal:  J Microsc       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.758

5.  Brain size, sex, and the aging brain.

Authors:  Lutz Jäncke; Susan Mérillat; Franziskus Liem; Jürgen Hänggi
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Statistical adjustments for brain size in volumetric neuroimaging studies: some practical implications in methods.

Authors:  Liam M O'Brien; David A Ziegler; Curtis K Deutsch; Jean A Frazier; Martha R Herbert; Joseph J Locascio
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 3.222

7.  Handedness- and brain size-related efficiency differences in small-world brain networks: a resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  Meiling Li; Junping Wang; Feng Liu; Heng Chen; Fengmei Lu; Guorong Wu; Chunshui Yu; Huafu Chen
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2014-12-23

8.  On two equations about brain volume, cranial capacity and age.

Authors:  Anne-Sophie Ricard; Pascal Desbarats; Mathieu Laurentjoye; Michel Montaudon; Philippe Caix; Vincent Dousset; Claire Majoufre-Lefebvre; Bruno Maureille
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2010-03-14       Impact factor: 1.246

9.  Brain size of Homo floresiensis and its evolutionary implications.

Authors:  Daisuke Kubo; Reiko T Kono; Yousuke Kaifu
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Scaling of human body composition to stature: new insights into body mass index.

Authors:  Steven B Heymsfield; Dympna Gallagher; Laurel Mayer; Joel Beetsch; Angelo Pietrobelli
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 7.045

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.