Literature DB >> 9665418

Comparison of seven immunoassays for the quantification of CA 125 antigen in serum.

E M Davelaar1, G J van Kamp, R A Verstraeten, P Kenemans.   

Abstract

Seven CA 125 immunoassays were compared for their clinical performance. CA 125 concentrations were determined in 289 serum samples obtained from women with benign pelvic tumors (samples from 98 patients) and patients with various cancers (samples from 111 patients). In the range of 0-1000 kilounits/L, all assays tested were linearly correlated, with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.89 to 0.99. In relation to the original Centocor CA 125 assay, there was an overall tendency to measure higher absolute values in the lower CA 125 value range. This was not seen in relation to the Centocor CA 125 II assay. ROC curves (benign vs pretreatment ovarian cancer patients) were nearly identical for all assays, and the areas under the ROC curves were not markedly different. We conclude that the CA 125 assays tested are strongly related to each other and are clinically reliable for the quantification of serum CA 125 and that none of the assays offers higher diagnostic accuracy or better discrimination between patient groups, especially not in the lower ranges.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9665418

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem        ISSN: 0009-9147            Impact factor:   8.327


  6 in total

1.  Validation of a Novel Biomarker Panel for the Detection of Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Felix Leung; Marcus Q Bernardini; Marshall D Brown; Yingye Zheng; Rafael Molina; Robert C Bast; Gerard Davis; Stefano Serra; Eleftherios P Diamandis; Vathany Kulasingam
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 2.  In 2014, can we do better than CA125 in the early detection of ovarian cancer?

Authors:  Joshua G Cohen; Matthew White; Ana Cruz; Robin Farias-Eisner
Journal:  World J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-08-26

3.  Evaluating the risk of ovarian cancer before surgery using the ADNEX model to differentiate between benign, borderline, early and advanced stage invasive, and secondary metastatic tumours: prospective multicentre diagnostic study.

Authors:  Ben Van Calster; Kirsten Van Hoorde; Lil Valentin; Antonia C Testa; Daniela Fischerova; Caroline Van Holsbeke; Luca Savelli; Dorella Franchi; Elisabeth Epstein; Jeroen Kaijser; Vanya Van Belle; Artur Czekierdowski; Stefano Guerriero; Robert Fruscio; Chiara Lanzani; Felice Scala; Tom Bourne; Dirk Timmerman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2014-10-15

4.  Evaluating the risk of ovarian cancer before surgery using the ADNEX model: a multicentre external validation study.

Authors:  A Sayasneh; L Ferrara; B De Cock; S Saso; M Al-Memar; S Johnson; J Kaijser; J Carvalho; R Husicka; A Smith; C Stalder; M C Blanco; G Ettore; B Van Calster; D Timmerman; T Bourne
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  Methods for identification of CA125 from ovarian cancer ascites by high resolution mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Florian Weiland; Katarina Fritz; Martin K Oehler; Peter Hoffmann
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 6.208

6.  Multicentre external validation of IOTA prediction models and RMI by operators with varied training.

Authors:  A Sayasneh; L Wynants; J Preisler; J Kaijser; S Johnson; C Stalder; R Husicka; Y Abdallah; F Raslan; A Drought; A A Smith; S Ghaem-Maghami; E Epstein; B Van Calster; D Timmerman; T Bourne
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 7.640

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.