Literature DB >> 9665288

Design of low cost glaucoma screening.

A G Niessen1, C T Langerhorst, H C Geijssen, E L Greve.   

Abstract

In 1991 the Netherlands Glaucoma Patient Association organized a glaucoma screening survey. This survey was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of a low cost screening setting. During a screening period of 8 days, 1259 subjects over the age of 49 years were examined by a team of non-ophthalmologically trained students. The following screening methods were used: visual field analysis (Henson CFS3000 perimeter), retinal nerve fiber layer photography (Canon non-mydriatic camera), intraocular pressure measurement (Pulsair non-contact tonometer) and determination of the peripheral anterior chamber depth (slitlamp biomicroscope, the van Herick method). In a later stage, subjects with glaucomatous abnormalities in the visual field and/or the photograph were re-examined by a glaucoma specialist using applanation tonometry, gonioscopy, ophthalmoscopy and Humphrey 30-2 visual field analysis. The time taken to conduct the individual screening tests in a subject varied from 1 to 5 min: perimetry took 5 min, photography 2 min, tonometry 3 min and angle-width determination 1 min. Fifty-six (4.4%) subjects showed glaucomatous defects in perimetry and/or photography. Thirty-seven could be re-examined and glaucoma was diagnosed in 16 subjects. Visual field defects and glaucomatous abnormalities in the photograph were confirmed by Humphrey perimetry in 72.7% and 35.7% respectively. Sixty-seven (5.3%) subjects had an intraocular pressure above 21 mm Hg, while no cases of angle closure glaucoma were found in this population. The costs of this screening setting were estimated at F1. 48,60 per screen. A future low cost screening survey might be limited to non-contact tonometry and visual field analysis with the Henson CFS3000 perimeter or a similar device, using suprathreshold testing with a limited number of points. Screening might be performed by non-medically trained employees. The costs of such a screening program may be estimated at F1. 16,- per screen and F1. 1.989,- per glaucoma case using a mobile screening unit (addendum).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9665288     DOI: 10.1007/bf02569068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  41 in total

1.  Racial variations in the prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma. The Baltimore Eye Survey.

Authors:  J M Tielsch; A Sommer; J Katz; R M Royall; H A Quigley; J Javitt
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-07-17       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Reproducibility with the Keeler Pulsair 2000 non-contact tonometer.

Authors:  S A Vernon
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Estimating incidence from age-specific prevalence in glaucoma.

Authors:  M C Leske; F Ederer; M Podgor
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Screening for glaucoma in the community by non-ophthalmologically trained staff using semi automated equipment.

Authors:  S A Vernon; D J Henry; L Cater; S J Jones
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  Alternative definitions of open-angle glaucoma. Effect on prevalence and associations in the Framingham eye study.

Authors:  H A Kahn; R C Milton
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1980-12

6.  Follow-up of angle-closure glaucoma suspects.

Authors:  J T Wilensky; P L Kaufman; D Frohlichstein; D K Gieser; M A Kass; R Ritch; R Anderson
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1993-03-15       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  The nerve fiber layer in the diagnosis of glaucoma.

Authors:  A Sommer; N R Miller; I Pollack; A E Maumenee; T George
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1977-12

8.  Relationship between intraocular pressure and primary open angle glaucoma among white and black Americans. The Baltimore Eye Survey.

Authors:  A Sommer; J M Tielsch; J Katz; H A Quigley; J D Gottsch; J Javitt; K Singh
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1991-08

9.  Non-contact tonometry: optometrists' current practice in England and Wales.

Authors:  M W Tuck; R P Crick
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  Costing a community based screening programme for the detection of glaucoma.

Authors:  S J Jones; S A Vernon; L Cater; D J Henry
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.775

View more
  1 in total

1.  The treatment of newly diagnosed patients with glaucoma or with ocular hypertension in The Netherlands: an observational study of costs and initial treatment success based on retrospective chart review.

Authors:  J B Oostenbrink; M P Rutten-van Mölken; T S Opdenoordt
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.854

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.