Literature DB >> 9665190

Prognostic relevance of the expression of Tdt and CD7 in 335 cases of acute myeloid leukemia.

A Venditti1, G Del Poeta, F Buccisano, A Tamburini, M C Cox-Froncillo, G Aronica, A Bruno, B Del Moro, A M Epiceno, A Battaglia, L Forte, M Postorino, V Cordero, S Santinelli, S Amadori.   

Abstract

We have analyzed the expression of Tdt and CD7 in 335 cases of unequivocal acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Tdt was expressed in 80 (25%) of 321 evaluable cases. Twenty-six of 77 (34%) Tdt+ patients assessable for response, entered complete remission (CR) vs 121 of 209 (58%) Tdt- cases (P < 0.001). CD7 was expressed in 102 of 332 (30%) evaluable cases; 37 of 93 assessable (40%) CD7+ patients attained a CR as compared to 114/204 (56%) CD7- (P = 0.013). Duration of survival was significantly shorter for patients with CD7+ or Tdt+ AML (P = 0.006 and 0.001, respectively). In a multivariate analysis, Tdt was found to significantly adverse achievement of CR (P = 0.018), while CD7 affected duration of CR (P = 0.037). Overall the expression of either Tdt or CD7 correlated with a relatively high expression of CD34 (P < 0.001), GP-170 (P = 0.003), lymphoid antigens (LyAg) (P < 0.001), t(9;22) or anomalies of chromosome 5/7 (P < 0.001). Finally, we pooled the patients into four phenotypic classes, according to the presence of Tdt, CD7 or both: [Tdt-CD7-], [Tdt+CD7-], [Tdt-CD7+] and [Tdt+CD7+]. The category [Tdt+CD7+] was characterized by a more unfavorable outcome as suggested by a lower rate of CR (P < 0.001) and a shorter duration of survival as compared to cases [Tdt-CD7-], [Tdt+CD7-] and [Tdt-CD7+] (P = 0.002). This figure is consistent with the frequent convergence in the subset [Tdt+CD7+] of GP-170 positivity (P = 0.003), translocation t(9;22), anomalies of chromosome 5 and/or 7 (P < 0.001) and signs of lineage infidelity (deviant expression of lymphoid antigens) (P < 0.001). We conclude that the expression of Tdt or CD7 is associated with an unfavorable outcome and that the combination of both defines a clinical subset with a poorer prognosis due to the significantly higher association with MDR phenotype, and 'poor prognostic' chromosomal abnormalities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9665190     DOI: 10.1038/sj.leu.2401067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Leukemia        ISSN: 0887-6924            Impact factor:   11.528


  20 in total

1.  Independent component analysis: mining microarray data for fundamental human gene expression modules.

Authors:  Jesse M Engreitz; Bernie J Daigle; Jonathan J Marshall; Russ B Altman
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 6.317

2.  Concomitant aberrant methylation of p15 and MGMT genes in acute myeloid leukemia: association with a particular immunophenotype of blast cells.

Authors:  Nada Kraguljac Kurtović; Milena Krajnović; Andrija Bogdanović; Nada Suvajdžić; Jelica Jovanović; Bogomir Dimitrijević; Milica Colović; Koviljka Krtolica
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2012-07-07       Impact factor: 3.064

3.  EuroFlow antibody panels for standardized n-dimensional flow cytometric immunophenotyping of normal, reactive and malignant leukocytes.

Authors:  J J M van Dongen; L Lhermitte; S Böttcher; J Almeida; V H J van der Velden; J Flores-Montero; A Rawstron; V Asnafi; Q Lécrevisse; P Lucio; E Mejstrikova; T Szczepański; T Kalina; R de Tute; M Brüggemann; L Sedek; M Cullen; A W Langerak; A Mendonça; E Macintyre; M Martin-Ayuso; O Hrusak; M B Vidriales; A Orfao
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 11.528

4.  Refractory de novo myeloid sarcoma: a case report and therapeutic strategy based on bone marrow minimal residual disease.

Authors:  Daichi Inoue; Yuya Nagai; Takaharu Kimura; Sonoko Shimoji; Minako Mori; Katsuhiro Togami; Sumie Tabata; Masayuki Kurata; Akiko Matsushita; Kiminari Ito; Hisako Hashimoto; Hayato Maruoka; Eiko Yamashita; Kenichi Nagai; Yukihiro Imai; Hirohumi Shirane; Takayuki Takahashi
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 2.490

5.  Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation with Myeloablative Conditioning Is Associated with Favorable Outcomes in Mixed Phenotype Acute Leukemia.

Authors:  Bartlomiej M Getta; Mikhail Roshal; Junting Zheng; Jae H Park; Eytan M Stein; Ross Levine; Esperanza B Papadopoulos; Ann A Jakubowski; Nancy A Kernan; Peter Steinherz; Richard J O'Reilly; Miguel-Angel Perales; Sergio A Giralt; Martin S Tallman; Brian C Shaffer
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2017-07-08       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  RUNX1 mutations in cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia are associated with a poor prognosis and up-regulation of lymphoid genes.

Authors:  Philipp A Greif; Nikola P Konstandin; Klaus H Metzeler; Tobias Herold; Zlatana Pasalic; Bianka Ksienzyk; Annika Dufour; Friederike Schneider; Stephanie Schneider; Purvi M Kakadia; Jan Braess; Maria Cristina Sauerland; Wolfgang E Berdel; Thomas Büchner; Bernhard J Woermann; Wolfgang Hiddemann; Karsten Spiekermann; Stefan K Bohlander
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 9.941

7.  Prognostic significance of flow cytometric immunophenotyping in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Brian A Webber; Melissa M Cushing; Shiyong Li
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2008-01-01

8.  Prognostic implications of CD14 positivity in acute myeloid leukemia arising from myelodysplastic syndrome.

Authors:  Yunsuk Choi; Je-Hwan Lee; Sung-Doo Kim; Dae-Young Kim; Jung-Hee Lee; Miee Seol; Young-Ah Kang; Mijin Jeon; Ah Rang Jung; Kyoo-Hyung Lee
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 9.  Treatment concepts for elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Wolfgang R Sperr; Alexander W Hauswirth; Friedrich Wimazal; Paul Knöbl; Klaus Geissler; Peter Valent
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2003-08-14       Impact factor: 1.704

10.  Immunophenotypic, cytogenetic and clinical features of 192 AML patients in China.

Authors:  Haixia Tong; Chunwei Lu; Jihong Zhang; Zhuogang Liu; Yu Ma
Journal:  Clin Exp Med       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 3.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.