Literature DB >> 9664601

Prenatal diagnosis of major malformations: quality control of routine ultrasound examinations based on a five-year study of 20,248 newborn fetuses and infants.

A Queisser-Luft1, H Stopfkuchen, G Stolz, K Schlaefer, E Merz.   

Abstract

Antenatal ultrasound screening for birth defects is increasingly becoming a routine procedure of prenatal care. Prenatal detection of malformations and subsequent adjustment of obstetric management are essential for secondary prevention. It is unknown whether ultrasound screening is effective in all pregnant women, or should only be performed in high risk populations. From 1990-1994, 20,248 livebirths, stillbirths and abortions underwent physical and sonographic examinations and anamnestic data were collected. To identify the high risk group, case control analyses of births with one of the 23 selected major malformations (controls) were performed with respect to anamnestic risk factors. All women had at least three routine ultrasound scans. The selected malformations were diagnosed in 298 children; 95 (30.3 per cent) were diagnosed antenatally. Detection rates were: CNS (68.6 per cent), gastro-intestinal tract (42.3 per cent), urinary system (24.1) per cent), heart (5.9 per cent). Complications during pregnancy were calculated as indicators of congenital anomalies: premature labour (< 28 week) OR 4.7 (3.8-5.9), placental insufficiency OR 1.9 (1.1-2.7) and vaginal bleeding OR 1.5 (1.2-1.8), etc. Antenatal routine ultrasound screening is not effective risk populations. Anamnestic risk factors risk factors during pregnancy may be essential indicators for identifying high risk populations. We propose screening of the described high risk pregnancies (about 22 per cent of all pregnancies) to be performed by specially trained and highly experienced ultrasonographers to increase sensitivity rates and benefit cost effectiveness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9664601

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  4 in total

Review 1.  Renal development in the fetus and premature infant.

Authors:  Stacy Rosenblum; Abhijeet Pal; Kimberly Reidy
Journal:  Semin Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 3.926

2.  The Evaluation of Genetic Diagnosis on High-Risk Fetal CAKUT.

Authors:  Wanlu Liu; Xinwei Shi; Yuqi Li; Fuyuan Qiao; Suhua Chen; Ling Feng; Wanjiang Zeng; Dongrui Deng; Yuanyuan Wu
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  Care-related factors associated with antepartal diagnosis of intrauterine growth restriction: a case-control study.

Authors:  Sinja Alexandra Ernst; Anna Reeske; Jacob Spallek; Knud Petersen; Tilman Brand; Hajo Zeeb
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Another Case of De Novo 3q26.33q27.3 Microdeletion and Its Medicolegal Sequel.

Authors:  Ugo Indraccolo; Salvatore Renato Indraccolo; Piergiorgio Fedeli
Journal:  Case Rep Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-02-07
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.