Literature DB >> 9664148

Epiluminescence microscopy-based classification of pigmented skin lesions using computerized image analysis and an artificial neural network.

M Binder1, H Kittler, A Seeber, A Steiner, H Pehamberger, K Wolff.   

Abstract

Epiluminescence microscopy (ELM) is a non-invasive technique for in vivo examination which can provide additional criteria for the clinical diagnosis of pigmented skin lesions (PSLs). In the present study we attempt to determine whether PSLs can be automatically diagnosed by an integrated computerized system. This system should recognize the PSL, automatically extract features and use these features in training an artificial neural network, which should--if sufficiently trained--be capable of recognizing and classifying a new PSL without human aid. One hundred and twenty images of randomly selected histologically proven PSLs (33 common naevi, 48 dysplastic naevi and 39 malignant melanomas) were used in this study. The images were digitally obtained and the morphological features of the PSLs were extracted electronically without human assistance. The numerical data were then divided into learning and testing cases and linked to an artificial neural network for training and for further classification of lesions that the system had not been trained on. Our results show that the computerized system was able to automatically identify 95% of the PSLs presented. The sensitivity and specificity of the computerized system were 90% and 74% respectively. In contrast, when differentiating between individual types of lesions, the system performed at true positive rates of only 38% for malignant melanoma, 62% for dysplastic naevi and 33% for common naevi. Our data indicate that (1) ELM images of PSLs provide an excellent source for digital image analysis; (2) the vast majority of PSLs can be correctly identified by a relatively simple (and thus not "intelligent") application of digital image analysis; (3) automatic feature extraction based mainly on ABCD rules provides reliable data on the distinction between benign and malignant PSLs; and (4) there is evidence that artificial neural networks can be trained to adequately discriminate between benign and malignant PSLs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9664148     DOI: 10.1097/00008390-199806000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Melanoma Res        ISSN: 0960-8931            Impact factor:   3.599


  14 in total

Review 1.  Distribution quantification on dermoscopy images for computer-assisted diagnosis of cutaneous melanomas.

Authors:  Zhao Liu; Jiuai Sun; Lyndon Smith; Melvyn Smith; Robert Warr
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  [Dermatoscopy-30 years after the First Consensus Conference].

Authors:  Andreas Blum; Friedrich A Bahmer; Jürgen Bauer; Ralph P Braun; Brigitte Coras-Stepanek; Teresa Deinlein; Thomas Eigentler; Christine Fink; Claus Garbe; Holger A Haenssle; Rainer Hofmann-Wellenhof; Harald Kittler; Jürgen Kreusch; Hubert Pehamberger; Hans Schulz; H Peter Soyer; Wilhelm Stolz; Philipp Tschandl; Iris Zalaudek
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 0.751

3.  Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks.

Authors:  Andre Esteva; Brett Kuprel; Roberto A Novoa; Justin Ko; Susan M Swetter; Helen M Blau; Sebastian Thrun
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  The role of spectrophotometry in the diagnosis of melanoma.

Authors:  Paolo A Ascierto; Marco Palla; Fabrizio Ayala; Ileana De Michele; Corrado Caracò; Antonio Daponte; Ester Simeone; Stefano Mori; Maurizio Del Giudice; Rocco A Satriano; Antonio Vozza; Giuseppe Palmieri; Nicola Mozzillo
Journal:  BMC Dermatol       Date:  2010-08-13

Review 5.  Current and emerging technologies in melanoma diagnosis: the state of the art.

Authors:  Estee L Psaty; Allan C Halpern
Journal:  Clin Dermatol       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.541

6.  Computer-assisted diagnosis techniques (dermoscopy and spectroscopy-based) for diagnosing skin cancer in adults.

Authors:  Lavinia Ferrante di Ruffano; Yemisi Takwoingi; Jacqueline Dinnes; Naomi Chuchu; Susan E Bayliss; Clare Davenport; Rubeta N Matin; Kathie Godfrey; Colette O'Sullivan; Abha Gulati; Sue Ann Chan; Alana Durack; Susan O'Connell; Matthew D Gardiner; Jeffrey Bamber; Jonathan J Deeks; Hywel C Williams
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-12-04

7.  Lacunarity analysis: a promising method for the automated assessment of melanocytic naevi and melanoma.

Authors:  Stephen Gilmore; Rainer Hofmann-Wellenhof; Jim Muir; H Peter Soyer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-10-13       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Prediction of skin disease using a new cytological taxonomy based on cytology and pathology with deep residual learning method.

Authors:  Jin Bu; Yu Lin; Li-Qiong Qing; Gang Hu; Pei Jiang; Hai-Feng Hu; Er-Xia Shen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Strategies for early recognition of cutaneous melanoma-present and future.

Authors:  Franziska Brehmer; Martina Ulrich; Holger A Haenssle
Journal:  Dermatol Pract Concept       Date:  2012-07-31

Review 10.  Computer aided diagnostic support system for skin cancer: a review of techniques and algorithms.

Authors:  Ammara Masood; Adel Ali Al-Jumaily
Journal:  Int J Biomed Imaging       Date:  2013-12-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.