Literature DB >> 9663976

The practice of general internal medicine by subspecialists.

B Stimmel1, S Haddow, L Smith.   

Abstract

To determine the proportion of specialists in internal medicine at a university medical center practicing general internal medicine in addition to their specialty, full-time and voluntary faculty were asked to complete a questionnaire concerning their practice patterns. In addition, the directories of two of the largest managed-care groups in the area were reviewed to identify physicians who were also faculty members, to determine whether faculty in these directories self-identified as general internists. Excluding those with primary research appointments, 303 faculty in the Department of Medicine were asked to participate. Of these, 187 (62%) responded, of whom 86 (46%) were full-time and 101 (54%) voluntary faculty. Of the respondents, 183 (98%) were either board certified (152; 81%) or board eligible (31; 17%) in a subspecialty. Both general internal medicine and specialty medicine were practiced by 116 (65%), with full-time faculty being more likely to have solely subspecialty practices (P < .001). The majority of faculty (150; 80%) participated in managed care. A review of directories of two managed-care groups revealed that 100 (87%) of the 115 faculty with appointments within subspecialty divisions of the Department of Medicine were listed as general internists. Subspecialists in internal medicine already spend considerable time practicing general medicine and are increasingly willing to identify themselves as generalists. Unless this is recognized, the future need for generalists may be overestimated considerably.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9663976      PMCID: PMC3456294          DOI: 10.1007/BF02344938

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urban Health        ISSN: 1099-3460            Impact factor:   3.671


  12 in total

1.  US graduate medical education, 1996-1997.

Authors:  M R Dunn; R S Miller
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-09-03       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  The contribution of specialists to the delivery of primary care.

Authors:  L H Aiken; C E Lewis; J Craig; R C Mendenhall; R J Blendon; D E Rogers
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1979-06-14       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  AAMC policy on the generalist physician.

Authors: 
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 6.893

4.  The doctor is in.

Authors:  R G Petersdorf
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 6.893

5.  The initial employment status of physicians completing training in 1994.

Authors:  R S Miller; H S Jonas; M E Whitcomb
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-03-06       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  A cross-national comparison of generalist physician workforce data. Evidence for US supply adequacy.

Authors:  M E Whitcomb
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-09-06       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Forecasting the effects of health reform on US physician workforce requirement. Evidence from HMO staffing patterns.

Authors:  J P Weiner
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-07-20       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Seeking a balanced physician workforce for the 21st century.

Authors:  R A Cooper
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-09-07       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Variations in resource utilization among medical specialties and systems of care. Results from the medical outcomes study.

Authors:  S Greenfield; E C Nelson; M Zubkoff; W Manning; W Rogers; R L Kravitz; A Keller; A R Tarlov; J E Ware
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992-03-25       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Who is the primary physician?

Authors:  J S Spiegel; L V Rubenstein; B Scott; R H Brook
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1983-05-19       Impact factor: 91.245

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.