Literature DB >> 9663739

Tissue response to polypropylene meshes used in the repair of abdominal wall defects.

J M Bellón1, L A Contreras, J Buján, D Palomares, A Carrera-San Martín.   

Abstract

The degree of integration of biomaterials used in the repair of abdominal wall defects seems to depend upon the structure of the prosthesis. Several polypropylene (PP) prostheses are currently available which differ in the number of PP filaments, the type of weave and the porosity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the integration, adhesion formation and resistance to traction of three types of PP prostheses (Marlex, Trelex and Prolene) used in the partial or total repair of abdominal wall defects. Abdominal wall defects (7 x 5 cm) were created in 54 New Zealand rabbits involving all the tissue layers (total substitutions (TS); n = 27) or all layers excluding the parietal peritoneum (partial substitutions (PS); n = 27). The defects were repaired with PP monofilament prostheses of different weave (1 mm porosity) (Marlex, n = 18; Trelex, n = 18) or bifilament (2 mm porosity) (Prolene; n = 18). They were placed in contact on one side with subcutaneous tissue and on the other with abdominal viscera or parietal peritoneum. Animals were killed at 30, 60 and 90 days and samples of prosthesis and scar tissue processed for light and scanning microscopy. The adhesion formation with viscera was evaluated. Resistance to traction was measured with a tensiometer using strips including the prosthesis and anchorage tissue. Adhesions were detected in all the TS and in four PS. Microscopic analysis revealed total integration of the TS samples by fibrous and disorganized tissue. Prostheses used for PS were integrated by white adipose tissue with the exception of the areas around the mesh nodes and anchorage zones. The foreign body reaction could be seen as a moderate accumulation of white blood cells. Tensiometric analysis showed an increase in resistance to traction with time (P < 0.001) in each type of prosthesis, but no differences were detected (P > 0.001) between them. We concluded that: (a) the formation of adhesions was almost inhibited when the parietal peritoneum was left intact; (b) in both TS and PS, polypropylene prostheses integrated completely although the composition of the scar tissue was seem to differ; and (c) resistance to traction was similar in both TS and PS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9663739     DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(97)00162-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  14 in total

1.  Collagen-coated vs noncoated low-weight polypropylene meshes in a sheep model for vaginal surgery. A pilot study.

Authors:  Renaud de Tayrac; Antoine Alves; Michel Thérin
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2006-08-29

2.  In vivo comparison of suburethral sling materials.

Authors:  M Slack; J S Sandhu; D R Staskin; R C Grant
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2005-07-02

Review 3.  Xenograft use in reconstructive pelvic surgery: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Emanuel C Trabuco; Christopher J Klingele; John B Gebhart
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-01-17

4.  Tensile strength and host response towards different polypropylene implant materials used for augmentation of fascial repair in a rat model.

Authors:  Maja L Konstantinovic; Eline Pille; Marta Malinowska; Eric Verbeken; Dirk De Ridder; Jan Deprest
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2006-10-10

5.  Nitro-Oleic Acid (NO2-OA) Release Enhances Regional Angiogenesis in a Rat Abdominal Wall Defect Model.

Authors:  Antonio D'Amore; Marco Fazzari; Hong-Bin Jiang; Samuel K Luketich; Michael E Luketich; Richard Hoff; Daniel L Jacobs; Xinzhu Gu; Stephen F Badylak; Bruce A Freeman; William R Wagner
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 6.  The biology behind fascial defects and the use of implants in pelvic organ prolapse repair.

Authors:  Jan Deprest; Fang Zheng; Maja Konstantinovic; Federico Spelzini; Filip Claerhout; Anneke Steensma; Yves Ozog; Dirk De Ridder
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2006-06

7.  Long-lasting bioresorbable poly(lactic acid) (PLA94) mesh: a new approach for soft tissue reinforcement based on an experimental pilot study.

Authors:  Renaud de Tayrac; Marie-Claire Oliva-Lauraire; Isabelle Guiraud; Laurent Henry; Michel Vert; Pierre Mares
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-01-09

8.  Mesh contraction: in vivo documentation of changes in apparent surface area utilizing meshes visible on magnetic resonance imaging in the rabbit abdominal wall model.

Authors:  Masayuki Endo; Andrew Feola; Nikhil Sindhwani; Stefano Manodoro; Jarek Vlacil; Alexander Carl Engels; Filip Claus; Jan A Deprest
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  Intraabdominal adhesion formation of polypropylene mesh. Influence of coverage of omentum and polyglactin.

Authors:  J Conze; K Junge; U Klinge; C Weiss; M Polivoda; A P Oettinger; V Schumpelick
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-05-03       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Bilateral endoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair does not impair male fertility.

Authors:  M M Roos; G J Clevers; E J Verleisdonk; P H Davids; C van de Water; R J Spermon; L S Mulder; J P J Burgmans
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 4.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.