Literature DB >> 9663409

Improvement in cumulative response rates following implementation of a financial incentive.

E Gilbart1, N Kreiger.   

Abstract

Risk estimates arising from case-control studies can be unreliable if the level of response to mailed questionnaires is inadequate. Several studies have reported improved early response rates to mailed questionnaires following the implementation of financial incentives. Improvements in cumulative response rates at the completion of the follow-up period, however, have not been as pronounced. A financial incentive of $5.00 was implemented among control subjects in a large population-based case-control study of Ontario, Canada, women. Required follow-up time and effort were decreased for the controls who received the incentive compared with those who did not. More importantly, cumulative response rates after more than 20 weeks were 20 percent higher among controls who received the incentive.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9663409     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009565

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  7 in total

1.  Can incentives undermine intrinsic motivation to participate in epidemiologic surveys?

Authors:  Marika Wenemark; Asa Vernby; Annika Lindahl Norberg
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  Why do we pay? A national survey of investigators and IRB chairpersons.

Authors:  Elizabeth Ripley; Francis Macrina; Monika Markowitz; Chris Gennings
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.742

3.  Recruiting elderly African-American women in cancer prevention and control studies: a multifaceted approach and its effectiveness.

Authors:  K Zhu; S Hunter; L J Bernard; K Payne-Wilks; C L Roland; R S Levine
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 1.798

4.  Predictors of successful telephone follow-up in a multicenter study of infants with severe bronchiolitis.

Authors:  Vickie Wu; Nora Abo-Sido; Janice A Espinola; Courtney N Tierney; Kathleen T Tedesco; Ashley F Sullivan; Carlos A Camargo
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 3.797

5.  The marketing plan and outcome indicators for recruiting and retaining parents in the HomeStyles randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Carol Byrd-Bredbenner; Colleen Delaney; Jennifer Martin-Biggers; Mallory Koenings; Virginia Quick
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  Blood spots as an alternative to whole blood collection and the effect of a small monetary incentive to increase participation in genetic association studies.

Authors:  Parveen Bhatti; Diane Kampa; Bruce H Alexander; Christopher McClure; Danny Ringer; Michele M Doody; Alice J Sigurdson
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 4.615

7.  Age of smoking initiation and risk of breast cancer in a sample of Ontario women.

Authors:  Erin Young; Scott Leatherdale; Margaret Sloan; Nancy Kreiger; Andriana Barisic
Journal:  Tob Induc Dis       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 2.600

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.