Literature DB >> 9663243

A bedside test to determine motion stereopsis using the Pulfrich phenomenon.

D S Mojon1, K M Rösler, H Oetliker.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Many diseases induce asymmetric delays in the visual pathway, resulting in a spontaneous Pulfrich phenomenon (PP). The PP is a visual stereoillusion that may cause difficulties in persons when traveling in cars, crossing the road, or playing ball games. The authors developed and tested a simple new bedside procedure to detect PP.
DESIGN: A case series. PARTICIPANTS: Disease simulation in 2 normal subjects and 18 patients with optic neuritis (ON) was examined. Ninety normal subjects were studied to determine normal range of PP. INTERVENTION: The new test, called swinging pen test (SPT), is performed by oscillating a pen by hand. The SPT was compared to a gold standard, a mechanical pendulum (MP). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The authors measured simulated PP in two normal subjects and PP in 18 patients with ON and 90 normal control subjects. The Pearson product-moment correlation (r) and the Spearman rank correlation (rs) between SPT and MP were calculated.
RESULTS: The magnitudes of simulated PP determined with the SPT and the MP correlated well (r = 0.92, P < 0.005, and r = 0.96, P < 0.001). Correlation also was good in patients with ON (rs = 0.90, P < 0.05). The positive predictive value of the SPT was 100%, and the negative predictive value was 92%. The PP was absent in all control subjects testing with either pendulum. The normal range for PP varied from -1.40 to 1.52 msec. For the SPT, the intraobserver variability coefficient was 8.2%, and the interobserver variability coefficient was 10.5%.
CONCLUSIONS: The authors believe that SPT will be of value to clinicians on bedside evaluation of motion stereopsis dysfunctions. The normal range of PP was approximately +/- -1.5 msec (approximately +/- -1.5 cm), corresponding to a 0.3-log unit neutral density filter).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9663243     DOI: 10.1016/S0161-6420(98)97044-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  5 in total

1.  Influence of the Pulfrich phenomenon on driving performance.

Authors:  Armin Breyer; Xiaoyi Jiang; Adrian Rütsche; Hanspeter Bieri; Thomas Oexl; Ann Baumann; Daniel S Mojon
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 2.  The Pulfrich effect in the clinic.

Authors:  Sijie Heng; Gordon N Dutton
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 3.  Optic neuritis.

Authors:  D Pau; N Al Zubidi; S Yalamanchili; G T Plant; A G Lee
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  The magnitude of monocular light attenuation required to elicit the Pulfrich illusion.

Authors:  C Vijay Reena Durai; Siddhart Rajendran; Michael A Webster; Sandeep Vempati; Shrikant R Bharadwaj
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 1.984

5.  Small-aperture monovision and the Pulfrich experience: absence of neural adaptation effects.

Authors:  Sotiris Plainis; Dionysia Petratou; Trisevgeni Giannakopoulou; Hema Radhakrishnan; Ioannis G Pallikaris; W Neil Charman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.