Literature DB >> 9662313

Management of pregnancies beyond forty-one weeks' gestation with an unfavorable cervix.

E F Magann1, S P Chauhan, B G Nevils, M F McNamara, M J Kinsella, J C Morrison.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to determine the optimal management of pregnancies beyond 41 weeks' gestation with a cervix unfavorable for induction. STUDY
DESIGN: All uncomplicated pregnancies that reached 41 weeks' gestation with a Bishop score of < or = 4 were randomly assigned to one of three groups: (1) daily cervical examinations, (2) daily membrane stripping, or (3) daily placement of prostaglandin gel until 42 weeks.
RESULTS: In 105 pregnancies the Bishop score on admission to labor and delivery was significantly greater in the groups receiving prostaglandin or stripping of the membranes versus the control group, whereas the converse was time of gestational age at delivery (p = 0.0001). Fewer patients required induction in the two treatment groups (20%, 17%) versus the control (69%) patients (p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Daily membrane stripping or daily placement of prostaglandin gel is successful in reducing the number of inductions at 42 weeks for postdatism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9662313     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70334-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  11 in total

1.  A Tribute to Nancy C. Chescheir, MD.

Authors:  Dwight J Rouse; Thomas W Riggs; John O Schorge
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 2.  Different methods for the induction of labour in outpatient settings.

Authors:  Therese Dowswell; Anthony J Kelly; Stefania Livio; Jane E Norman; Zarko Alfirevic
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-08-04

Review 3.  Membrane sweeping for induction of labour.

Authors:  M Boulvain; C Stan; O Irion
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2005-01-25

Review 4.  Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term.

Authors:  A Metin Gülmezoglu; Caroline A Crowther; Philippa Middleton; Emer Heatley
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-06-13

Review 5.  Use of labour induction and risk of cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ekaterina Mishanina; Ewelina Rogozinska; Tej Thatthi; Rehan Uddin-Khan; Khalid S Khan; Catherine Meads
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Induction of labour at or beyond 37 weeks' gestation.

Authors:  Philippa Middleton; Emily Shepherd; Jonathan Morris; Caroline A Crowther; Judith C Gomersall
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-07-15

7.  Randomized clinical trial evaluating the frequency of membrane sweeping with an unfavorable cervix at 39 weeks.

Authors:  Kathleen Putnam; Everett F Magann; Dorota A Doherty; Aaron T Poole; Marcia I Magann; William B Warner; Suneet P Chauhan
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2011-08-19

8.  Membrane sweeping for induction of labour.

Authors:  Elaine M Finucane; Deirdre J Murphy; Linda M Biesty; Gillian Ml Gyte; Amanda M Cotter; Ethel M Ryan; Michel Boulvain; Declan Devane
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-02-27

Review 9.  Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term.

Authors:  Philippa Middleton; Emily Shepherd; Caroline A Crowther
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-05-09

Review 10.  Pharmacological and mechanical interventions for labour induction in outpatient settings.

Authors:  Joshua P Vogel; Alfred O Osoti; Anthony J Kelly; Stefania Livio; Jane E Norman; Zarko Alfirevic
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-09-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.