Literature DB >> 9662289

Stillbirth evaluation: what tests are needed?

M H Incerpi1, D A Miller, R Samadi, R H Settlage, T M Goodwin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We sought to investigate what aspects of the stillbirth evaluation are considered to be essential and what tests can potentially be eliminated. STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of 745 stillbirths occurring from January 1990 to December 1994 was conducted. A stillbirth was defined by an estimated gestational age >20 weeks' gestational age or fetal weight >500 gm. We attempted to arrive at an apparent cause for each stillbirth after evaluation of genetic or chromosomal abnormalities, obstetric history, maternal medical illnesses, laboratory tests, autopsy findings, and placental pathologic conditions.
RESULTS: We found that the most important aspects of stillbirth evaluation were placental pathologic conditions and autopsy. When the placenta was examined, a significant abnormality was detected in 30% (160 of 529) of the cases. When autopsy was performed, only 31% of fetal deaths (142 of 462) were unexplained; however, when no autopsy was performed, 44% (125 of 283) were unexplained (p = 0.0002). The following laboratory evaluations that were routinely performed were found to yield little definitive information: antinuclear antibody testing, Kleihauer-Betke test, and screening for congenital infections (toxoplasmosis, other viruses, rubella, cytomegalovirus, and herpes simplex virus). Overall, 36% (267 of 745) of stillbirths still remained unexplained despite a thorough evaluation in most cases.
CONCLUSION: The causes of stillbirth are many and varied, with a large proportion having no obvious cause. As this study demonstrates, certain laboratory tests can be eliminated in the workup of fetal death. In the evaluation of stillbirth a complete systematic method that incorporates placental pathologic conditions, as well as autopsy findings, should prove to be beneficial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9662289     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70311-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  7 in total

1.  My approach to performing a perinatal or neonatal autopsy.

Authors:  H C Wainwright
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  The cooperative function of nuclear receptor coactivator 1 (NCOA1) and NCOA3 in placental development and embryo survival.

Authors:  Xian Chen; Zhaoliang Liu; Jianming Xu
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2010-08-04

3.  Use of active surveillance methodologies to examine over-reporting of stillbirths on fetal death certificates.

Authors:  Jennifer A Makelarski; Paul A Romitti; Kristin M Caspers; Soman Puzhankara; Bradley D McDowell; Kimberly N Piper
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2011-09-30

4.  Umbilical Cord Abnormalities and Stillbirth.

Authors:  Ibrahim A Hammad; Nathan R Blue; Amanda A Allshouse; Robert M Silver; Karen J Gibbins; Jessica M Page; Robert L Goldenberg; Uma M Reddy; George R Saade; Donald J Dudley; Vanessa R Thorsten; Deborah L Conway; Halit Pinar; Theodore J Pysher
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 7.623

5.  Placental pathology, perinatal death, neonatal outcome, and neurological development: a systematic review.

Authors:  Annemiek M Roescher; Albert Timmer; Jan Jaap H M Erwich; Arend F Bos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Making stillbirths count, making numbers talk - issues in data collection for stillbirths.

Authors:  J Frederik Frøen; Sanne J Gordijn; Hany Abdel-Aleem; Per Bergsjø; Ana Betran; Charles W Duke; Vincent Fauveau; Vicki Flenady; Sven Gudmund Hinderaker; G Justus Hofmeyr; Abdul Hakeem Jokhio; Joy Lawn; Pisake Lumbiganon; Mario Merialdi; Robert Pattinson; Anuraj Shankar
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Birth weight differences between preterm stillbirths and live births: analysis of population-based studies from the U.S. and Sweden.

Authors:  Xun Zhang; K S Joseph; Sven Cnattingius; Michael S Kramer
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 3.007

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.