Literature DB >> 9662223

Prognostic value of detection of myocardial viability using low-dose dobutamine echocardiography in infarcted patients.

M Anselmi1, G Golia, M Cicoira, M Tinto, M T Nitti, R Trappolin, A Rossi, L Zanolla, P Marino, P Zardini.   

Abstract

Revascularization can improve ventricular function in patients with viable myocardium, but whether and how the presence of viable myocardium affects prognosis of infarcted patients is still far from clear. Thus, 202 patients (173 men, 59 +/- 9 years old) with a previous or recent myocardial infarction (MI) and regional asynergies underwent low-dose dobutamine echocardiography (5-15 microg/kg per min) to assess myocardial viability and were followed for a period of 16 +/- 11 months after revascularization (89 patients) or medical therapy (113 patients). Four groups of patients were defined: (1) patients with viability, revascularized (n = 64); (2) patients with viability, treated medically (n = 52); (3) patients without viability, revascularized (n = 25); and (4) patients without viability, treated medically (n = 61). Of these patients, 45 (23%) patients suffered 57 cardiac events: 18 cardiac deaths (9%), 7 MIs, 12 unstable angina, 9 heart failures, and 11 new revascularization procedures. Patients with viability, revascularized, experienced a slightly lower event rate (22%) compared with patients with viability, treated medically, patients without viability, treated medically and patients without viability, revascularized (29%, 31%, and 36%, respectively; p = not significant [NS]). The frequency of events was then evaluated in those 108 patients with an ejection fraction < or =33%, in whom 14 cardiac deaths occurred: the incidence of cardiac death was slightly lower in patients with viability, revascularized (3/37, 8%) than in the patients with viability, treated medically (4/26, 15%), patients without viability, revascularized (2/11, 18%), or patients without viability, treated medically (5/34, 15%) (p = NS). Nonfatal cardiac events were significantly fewer (p <0.05) in patients with viability, revascularized (8%) and in patients without viability, treated medically (6%) than in patients with viability, treated medically and patients without viability, revascularized (27%). In infarcted patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction, the presence of viable myocardium, if left unrevascularized, leads to further events. On the contrary, in the absence of myocardial viability, revascularization could lead to a worse prognosis than medical therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9662223     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00049-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  10 in total

1.  Quantity of viable myocardium required to improve survival with revascularization in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yoichi Inaba; Jennifer A Chen; Steven R Bergmann
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 2.  Hibernating myocardium.

Authors:  John M Canty; James A Fallavollita
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 3.  Cardiac imaging to identify patients at risk for developing heart failure after myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Clerio F Azevedo; Susan Cheng; João A C Lima
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2005-12

4.  Fusion of coronary angiography and stress echocardiography for myocardial viability evaluation.

Authors:  S Bisplinghoff; C Hänisch; M Becker; K Radermacher; M de la Fuente
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 5.  Reversible congestive heart failure caused by myocardial hibernation.

Authors:  J M Wilson
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1999

6.  Myocardial viability assessed by dobutamine stress echocardiography predicts reduced mortality early after acute myocardial infarction: determining the risk of events after myocardial infarction (DREAM) study.

Authors:  J M A Swinburn; R Senior
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-04-14       Impact factor: 5.994

7.  Myocardial viability and survival in ischemic left ventricular dysfunction.

Authors:  Robert O Bonow; Gerald Maurer; Kerry L Lee; Thomas A Holly; Philip F Binkley; Patrice Desvigne-Nickens; Jaroslaw Drozdz; Pedro S Farsky; Arthur M Feldman; Torsten Doenst; Robert E Michler; Daniel S Berman; Jose C Nicolau; Patricia A Pellikka; Krzysztof Wrobel; Nasri Alotti; Federico M Asch; Liliana E Favaloro; Lilin She; Eric J Velazquez; Robert H Jones; Julio A Panza
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-04-04       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Long-term effects of percutaneous coronary intervention of the totally occluded infarct-related artery in the subacute phase after myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Judith S Hochman; Harmony R Reynolds; Vladimír Dzavík; Christopher E Buller; Witold Ruzyllo; Zygmunt P Sadowski; Aldo P Maggioni; Antonio C Carvalho; James M Rankin; Harvey D White; Suzanne Goldberg; Sandra A Forman; Daniel B Mark; Gervasio A Lamas
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2011-10-24       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 9.  Noninvasive assessment myocardial viability: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Kevin C Allman
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2013-06-15       Impact factor: 5.952

10.  Early prediction of myocardial viability after acute myocardial infarction by two-dimensional speckle tracking imaging.

Authors:  Jong Shin Woo; Tae-Kyung Yu; Woo-Shik Kim; Kwon Sam Kim; Weon Kim
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 3.327

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.