Literature DB >> 9662222

Clinical impact of echocardiography in prognostic stratification after acute myocardial infarction.

M Penco1, S Sciomer, C D Vizza, A Dagianti, A Vitarelli, S Romano, A Dagianti.   

Abstract

Risk stratification is mandatory in the management of the postinfarction period. The identification of high-risk patients, on the basis of clinical data (recurrent angina, overt heart failure, etc.), is quite easy, whereas stratification of uncomplicated subjects needs an accurate noninvasive strategy. In the last 20 years, echocardiography has been gaining an increasing role, allowing increasingly precise evaluation of infarct size. This detection of the extent of infarct size has a definite prognostic value. Since 1980, we have observed that a dysfunctioning left ventricular myocardium >40% marked patients with a poor prognosis. These observations are most important in asymptomatic infarct patients, in whom clinical features may not reflect the amount of left ventricular dysfunction. Our recent results on a large series of patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) without overt heart failure have shown that the extension of wall motion abnormalities at 2-dimensional (2D) echocardiography was highly predictive of cardiac death or new coronary events in a 3-year follow-up (univariate analysis; p <0.0005). Echocardiography also plays an important role in detecting postinfarct ischemia, as seen by its wide use during stress tests. In our experience, the response to exercise echocardiographic testing has a high prognostic value. In fact, in our series, univariate analysis (Kaplan-Meier) showed that the best predictors of coronary events were the number of markers of ischemia during exercise (p <0.00001), the work load (p <0.00001), a positive exercise echo (p <0.0005), and the echo score at rest (p <0.0005). Multivariate analysis (Cox) confirmed these data: number of markers of ischemia: odds ratio (OR) 4.45, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.5-13.1; work load: OR 2.46, CI 1.3-4.5; positive exercise echo OR 1.88, CI 1.1-3.2. Thus, serial echocardiography together with predischarge stress echocardiography is recommended for risk stratification after acute MI. In particular, in thrombolytic-treated patients, echo examinations allow the detection of functional recovery of viable reperfused myocardium whereas stress echo may show exercise-induced worsening in the region supplied by the infarct-related vessel, a predictor of a higher rate of coronary events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9662222     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00048-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  3 in total

1.  Changing trends in the evaluation of ejection fraction in patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction: the Worcester Heart Attack Study.

Authors:  Paul A Santolucito; Dennis A Tighe; Darleen Lessard; Rovshan M Ismailov; Joel M Gore; Jorge Yarzebski; Robert J Goldberg
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.749

2.  Trends in the use of echocardiography and left ventriculography to assess left ventricular ejection fraction in patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Samuel W Joffe; Armen Chalian; Dennis A Tighe; Gerard P Aurigemma; Jorge Yarzebski; Joel M Gore; Darleen Lessard; Robert J Goldberg
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.749

3.  In-hospital measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction and one-year outcomes in acute coronary syndromes: results from the IMMEDIATE Trial.

Authors:  Jayanta T Mukherjee; Joni R Beshansky; Robin Ruthazer; Hadeel Alkofide; Madhab Ray; David Kent; Warren J Manning; Gordon S Huggins; Harry P Selker
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 2.062

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.