Literature DB >> 9660534

Granisetron plus methylprednisolone for the control of high-dose cisplatin-induced emesis.

J P Kleisbauer1, C García-Girón, M Antimi, M C Azevedo, H Balmes, B Massuti-Sureda, A Contu, A Luque, P Pellier.   

Abstract

This double-blind, double-dummy, randomized study compared the 24 h efficacy and safety of granisetron alone (3 mg i.v. over 30 s) or in combination with methylprednisolone (250 mg i.v. twice daily) in preventing nausea and vomiting in 308 patients (254 males) receiving high-dose cisplatin (100 mg/m2 or above) for mainly lung, and head and neck cancers. All patients received oral follow-on therapy comprising oral granisetron and methylprednisolone during the following 6 days. Primary efficacy variables were the proportions of complete responses (CR; no vomiting, no worse than mild nausea, no rescue and no withdrawal), no vomiting and no nausea over the first 24 h following initiation of the cisplatin infusion. The two treatment groups were well matched for demographics, cancer site, cisplatin dose and duration of infusion. Granisetron plus methylprednisolone was significantly more effective than granisetron alone for all primary efficacy variables: CR 78 versus 59% (p<0.001), no vomiting 80 versus 61% (p<0.001) and no nausea 74 versus 57% (p<0.002). Significantly more patients receiving the combination were free of any emetic symptoms (74 versus 54%, p<0.001). Significantly fewer patients receiving combination therapy also required rescue therapy with i.v. granisetron (12.2 versus 21.7%, p=0.026). During the follow-on period, complete response rates varied day by day from 50 to 71%. Both treatments were well tolerated, with constipation, abdominal pain and headache as the most frequent adverse events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9660534     DOI: 10.1097/00001813-199806000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anticancer Drugs        ISSN: 0959-4973            Impact factor:   2.248


  5 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of intravenous palonosetron in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in adults.

Authors:  Zhou Likun; Jing Xiang; Ba Yi; Duan Xin; Zheng Liu Tao
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2011-01-31

2.  Anticipatory nausea in animal models: a review of potential novel therapeutic treatments.

Authors:  Erin M Rock; Cheryl L Limebeer; Linda A Parker
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-05-04       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Multicenter, randomized trial of ramosetron plus dexamethasone versus ramosetron alone in controlling cisplatin-induced emesis.

Authors:  Antonio Villalon; Valorie Chan
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2003-12-04       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 4.  Factors influencing the choice of 5-HT3-receptor antagonist antiemetics: focus on elderly cancer patients.

Authors:  Cesare Gridelli; Matti Aapro
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2004-03-04       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Control of nausea with palonosetron versus granisetron, both combined with dexamethasone, in patients receiving cisplatin- or anthracycline plus cyclophosphamide-based regimens.

Authors:  Kaoru Kubota; Mitsue Saito; Kenjiro Aogi; Ikuo Sekine; Hirohisa Yoshizawa; Yasuhiro Yanagita; Hiroshi Sakai; Kenichi Inoue; Chiyoe Kitagawa; Takashi Ogura
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 3.603

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.