OBJECTIVE: To search for a threshold of pulmonary oxygen toxicity in patients with acute respiratory failure. DESIGN: Retrospective study over a 10-year period. SETTING: Three intensive care units of two university hospitals. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: Seventy-four patients with acute respiratory failure ventilated continuously with a FIO2 > or = 0.9 for at least 48 h were selected. INTERVENTIONS: Information regarding status, scoring, diagnosis and therapeutic interventions upon admission and ICU course were extracted from the patients' charts. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: We found that total exposure [mean (standard error of the mean)] to a FIO2 of 0.9 (TE 90) or more was 5.6 (1.1) days in the 17 survivors (S) versus 5.9 (0.5) days in the 57 non-survivors (D) (NS). Total exposure time to a FIO2 more than 0.5 (TE 50) was 16.5 (2.6) days in S and 11.2 (1) days in D (p < 0.05). The PaO2/FIO2 ratio became significantly higher in S only 5 days after beginning FIO2 of 0.9 or more. Hypoxemia was not frequent at the time of death, whereas in 70% of the non-survivors there were at least three organ failures in the last 48 h. In univariate analysis, the duration of exposure to FIO2 of 0.9 or more was not different in survivors and non-survivors, and the average total duration of exposure to FIO2 of more than 0.5 was even longer in survivors. In multivariate analysis, exposure shorter than 10 days to FIO2 more than 0.5 and exposure longer than 4 days to a FIO2 of 0.9 or more were significantly associated with death. However, despite a larger exposure to a FIO2 of 0.9 or more during the last 5 years of the study, the trend moved towards a higher survival rate during this period compared with the first 5 years of the study. CONCLUSIONS: Thus, our data provide circumstantial evidence that the lungs of patients with acute respiratory failure might exhibit some relative resistance to prolonged oxygen exposure. Therefore, it might be worthwhile carrying out a prospective study of different FIO2 strategies in such patients.
OBJECTIVE: To search for a threshold of pulmonary oxygentoxicity in patients with acute respiratory failure. DESIGN: Retrospective study over a 10-year period. SETTING: Three intensive care units of two university hospitals. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: Seventy-four patients with acute respiratory failure ventilated continuously with a FIO2 > or = 0.9 for at least 48 h were selected. INTERVENTIONS: Information regarding status, scoring, diagnosis and therapeutic interventions upon admission and ICU course were extracted from the patients' charts. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: We found that total exposure [mean (standard error of the mean)] to a FIO2 of 0.9 (TE 90) or more was 5.6 (1.1) days in the 17 survivors (S) versus 5.9 (0.5) days in the 57 non-survivors (D) (NS). Total exposure time to a FIO2 more than 0.5 (TE 50) was 16.5 (2.6) days in S and 11.2 (1) days in D (p < 0.05). The PaO2/FIO2 ratio became significantly higher in S only 5 days after beginning FIO2 of 0.9 or more. Hypoxemia was not frequent at the time of death, whereas in 70% of the non-survivors there were at least three organ failures in the last 48 h. In univariate analysis, the duration of exposure to FIO2 of 0.9 or more was not different in survivors and non-survivors, and the average total duration of exposure to FIO2 of more than 0.5 was even longer in survivors. In multivariate analysis, exposure shorter than 10 days to FIO2 more than 0.5 and exposure longer than 4 days to a FIO2 of 0.9 or more were significantly associated with death. However, despite a larger exposure to a FIO2 of 0.9 or more during the last 5 years of the study, the trend moved towards a higher survival rate during this period compared with the first 5 years of the study. CONCLUSIONS: Thus, our data provide circumstantial evidence that the lungs of patients with acute respiratory failure might exhibit some relative resistance to prolonged oxygen exposure. Therefore, it might be worthwhile carrying out a prospective study of different FIO2 strategies in such patients.
Authors: Carlo Alberto Volta; Valentina Alvisi; Sara Bertacchini; Elisabetta Marangoni; Riccardo Ragazzi; Marco Verri; Raffaele Alvisi Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2006-01-24 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Rafael Fernandez; Gisela Gili; Ana Villagra; Josefina Lopez-Aguilar; Antonio Artigas Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2013-01-08 Impact factor: 17.440