Substrate use during and following moderate- and low-intensity exercise: implications for weight control.

Substrate utilization during and after low- and moderate-intensity exercise of similar caloric expenditure was compared. Ten active males [age: 26.9 (4.8) years; height: 181.1 (4.8) cm; Mass: 75.7 (8.8) kg; maximum O2 consumption (VO2max): 51.2 (4.8) ml x kg(-1) x min(-1)] cycled at 33% and 66% VO2max on separate days for 90 and 45 min, respectively. After exercise, subjects rested in a recumbent position for 6 h. Two h post-exercise, subjects ate a standard meal of 66% carbohydrate (CHO), 11% protein, and 23% fat. Near-continuous indirect calorimetry and measurement of urinary nitrogen excretion were used to determine substrate utilization. Total caloric expenditure was similar for the two trials; however, significantly (P < 0.05) more fat [42.4 (3.6) g versus 24.0 (12.2) g] and less CHO [142.5 (28.5) g versus 188.8 (45.2) g] was utilized as a substrate during the low-intensity compared to the moderate-intensity trial. Protein utilization was similar for the two trials. The difference in substrate use can be attributed to the exercise period because over twice as much fat was utilized during low-intensity [30.0 (11.0) g] compared to moderate-intensity exercise [13.6 (6.6) g]. Significantly more (P < 0.05) CHO was utilized during the moderate-intensity [106.0 (27.8) g] compared to the low-intensity exercise [68.7 (20.0) g]. Substrate use during the recovery period was not significantly different. We conclude that low-intensity, long-duration exercise results in a greater total fat oxidation than does moderate intensity exercise of similar caloric expenditure. Dietary-induced thermogenesis was not different for the two trials.