Literature DB >> 9660153

Sex-related differences in thermoregulatory responses while wearing protective clothing.

T M McLellan1.   

Abstract

This study examined the thermoregulatory responses of men (group M) and women (group F) to uncompensable heat stress. In total, 13 M [mean (SD) age 31.8 (4.7) years, mass 82.7 (12.5) kg, height 1.79 (0.06) m, surface area to mass ratio 2.46 (0.18) m2 x kg(-1) x 10(-2), Dubois surface area 2.01 (0.16) m2, %body fatness 14.6 (3.9)%, VO2peak 49.0 (4.8) ml x kg(-1) x min(-1)] and 17 F [23.2 (4.2) years, 62.4 (7.7) kg, 1.65 (0.07) m, 2.71 (0.14) m2 x kg(-1) x 10(-2), 1.68 (0.13) m2, 20.2 (4.8)%, 43.2 (6.6) ml x kg(-1) x min(-1), respectively] performed light intermittent exercise (repeated intervals of 15 min of walking at 4.0 km x h(-1) followed by 15 min of seated rest) in the heat (40 degrees C, 30% relative humidity) while wearing nuclear, biological, and chemical protective clothing (0.29 m2 x degrees C x W(-1) or 1.88 clo, Woodcock vapour permeability coefficient 0.33 i(m)). Group F consisted of eight non-users and nine users of oral contraceptives tested during the early follicular phase of their menstrual cycle. Heart rates were higher for F throughout the session reaching 166.7 (15.9) beats x min(-1) at 105 min (n = 13) compared with 145.1 (14.4) beats x min(-1) for M. Sweat rates and evaporation rates from the clothing were lower and average skin temperature (T(sk)) was higher for F. The increase in rectal temperature (T(re)) was significantly faster for the F, increasing 1.52 (0.29) degrees C after 105 min compared with an increase of 1.37 (0.29) degrees C for M. Tolerance times were significantly longer for M [142.9 (24.5) min] than for F [119.3 (17.3) min]. Partitional calorimetric estimates of heat storage (S) revealed that although the rate of S was similar between genders [42.1 (6.6) and 46.1 (9.7) W x m(-2) for F and M, respectively], S expressed per unit of total mass was significantly lower for F [7.76 (1.44) kJ x kg(-1)] compared with M [9.45 (1.26) kJ x kg(-1)]. When subjects were matched for body fatness (n = 8 F and 8 M), tolerance times [124.5 (14.7) and 140.3 (27.4) min for F and M, respectively] and S [8.67 (1.44) and 9.39 (1.05) kJ x kg(-1) for F and M, respectively] were not different between the genders. It was concluded that females are at a thermoregulatory disadvantage compared with males when wearing protective clothing and exercising in a hot environment. This disadvantage can be attributed to the lower specific heat of adipose versus non-adipose tissue and a higher percentage body fatness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9660153     DOI: 10.1007/s004210050383

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol        ISSN: 0301-5548


  8 in total

Review 1.  The thermophysiology of uncompensable heat stress. Physiological manipulations and individual characteristics.

Authors:  S S Cheung; T M McLellan; S Tenaglia
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 2.  Physiological responses to the menstrual cycle: implications for the development of heat illness in female athletes.

Authors:  Susan A Marsh; David G Jenkins
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Sex modulates whole-body sudomotor thermosensitivity during exercise.

Authors:  Daniel Gagnon; Glen P Kenny
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 4.  Does sex have an independent effect on thermoeffector responses during exercise in the heat?

Authors:  Daniel Gagnon; Glen P Kenny
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 5.  Physiological employment standards IV: integration of women in combat units physiological and medical considerations.

Authors:  Yoram Epstein; Ran Yanovich; Daniel S Moran; Yuval Heled
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 6.  Potential applications of heat and cold stress indices to sporting events.

Authors:  D S Moran
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  Heat Strain and Use of Heat Mitigation Strategies among COVID-19 Healthcare Workers Wearing Personal Protective Equipment-A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Coen C W G Bongers; Johannus Q de Korte; Mike Zwartkruis; Koen Levels; Boris R M Kingma; Thijs M H Eijsvogels
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Validation of a questionnaire for heat strain evaluation in women workers.

Authors:  Habibollah Dehghan; Ehsanollah Habibi; Peymaneh Habibi; Mohammad Reza Maracy
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2013-06
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.