Literature DB >> 9659981

Excitotoxic lesions of the hippocampus disrupt runway but not consummatory contrast.

C F Flaherty1, C Coppotelli, D Hsu, T Otto.   

Abstract

Rats shifted from a 12-pellet to a 1-pellet reward for running in a straight runway showed a decrease in start, run, and goal speed to levels below rats that received only the 1-pellet reward throughout training (a negative contrast effect). Contrast was greatest in the goal region of the runway. Rats with damage to the hippocampus produced by the excitotoxin ibotenic acid failed to show a negative contrast effect under these conditions. The same lesioned rats tested in a consummatory, contrast procedure following a shift from 32% to 4% sucrose showed a negative contrast effect equivalent to sham-lesioned rats. These data suggest that the hippocampus is necessary for behavioral outcomes based on encoding or comparison that affect approach behavior, but not for such outcomes that affect consummatory behavior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9659981     DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4328(97)00138-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  9 in total

1.  Emotion and relative reward processing: an investigation on instrumental successive negative contrast and ultrasonic vocalizations in the rat.

Authors:  K A Binkley; E S Webber; D D Powers; H C Cromwell
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 1.777

2.  Drug-motivated behavior in rats with lesions of the thalamic orosensory area.

Authors:  Jennifer E Nyland; Danielle N Alexander; Patricia S Grigson
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 1.912

Review 3.  Linking Social Cognition to Learning and Memory.

Authors:  Heloise Leblanc; Steve Ramirez
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Aversive properties of negative incentive shifts in Fischer 344 and Lewis rats.

Authors:  Adam Brewer; Patrick Johnson; Jeff Stein; Michael Schlund; Dean C Williams
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 5.  Incentive disengagement and the adaptive significance of frustrative nonreward.

Authors:  Mauricio R Papini; Sara Guarino; Christopher Hagen; Carmen Torres
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 1.926

6.  Lever-press duration as a measure of frustration in sucrose and drug reinforcement.

Authors:  Tileena E S Vasquez; Ryan J McAuley; Nikita S Gupta; Shyny Koshy; Yorkiris Marmol-Contreras; Thomas A Green
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Incentive or habit learning in amphibians?

Authors:  Rubén N Muzio; Virginia Pistone Creydt; Mariana Iurman; Mauro A Rinaldi; Bruno Sirani; Mauricio R Papini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Emotional Reactivity to Incentive Downshift in Adult Rats Exposed to Binge-Like Ethanol Exposure During Adolescence.

Authors:  José Manuel Lerma-Cabrera; Camilo Andrés Arévalo-Romero; Gustavo Alfredo Cortés-Toledo; Alfredo Alfonso Adriasola-Carrasco; Francisca Carvajal
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-02-19

9.  Hippocampal lesions impair rapid learning of a continuous spatial alternation task.

Authors:  Steve M Kim; Loren M Frank
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.