Literature DB >> 9659162

Somatic mutations, acetylator status, and prognosis in colorectal cancer.

J E Hardingham1, W J Butler, D Roder, A Dobrovic, R B Dymock, R E Sage, I C Roberts-Thomson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Somatic mutations in K-ras and TP53 may be associated with both acetylator status and prognosis in colorectal cancer. AIMS: To determine whether cancers with somatic mutations are more frequent in fast acetylators and whether mutations or acetylator status influence prognosis after colorectal surgery. PATIENTS: One hundred consecutive subjects undergoing elective surgery for colorectal cancer.
METHODS: Acetylator status was determined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) genotyping for polymorphism in the N-acetyltransferase 2 (NAT2) gene. Mutations in K-ras (codon 12) and TP53 were determined by PCR analysis using restriction enzyme digestion and single strand conformation polymorphism respectively. Survival from colorectal cancer for up to five years after diagnosis was analysed using the Kaplan-Meier product limit estimator. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to compare survival rates after adjusting for tumour stage.
RESULTS: Mutations in K-ras and TP53 were independent of acetylator status. By log rank test, survival was significantly reduced in subjects with TP53 mutations (p = 0.003) but was not significantly related to acetylator status or the presence of K-ras mutations. After adjustment for tumour stage, subjects with both TP53 and K-ras mutations had a 4.2-fold case fatality (95% confidence interval 1.5 to 11.6) when compared with that of a TP53 negative reference group.
CONCLUSION: The presence of both TP53 and K-ras mutations in colorectal tumours is an adverse prognostic marker which is independent of tumour stage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9659162      PMCID: PMC1727095          DOI: 10.1136/gut.42.5.669

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  23 in total

1.  P53 in tumour pathology: can we trust immunocytochemistry?

Authors:  D Wynford-Thomas
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 7.996

2.  Immunobead-PCR: a technique for the detection of circulating tumor cells using immunomagnetic beads and the polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  J E Hardingham; D Kotasek; B Farmer; R N Butler; J X Mi; R E Sage; A Dobrovic
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1993-08-01       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Survival and acquired genetic alterations in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  P Laurent-Puig; S Olschwang; O Delattre; Y Remvikos; B Asselain; T Melot; P Validire; M Muleris; J Girodet; R J Salmon
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Simultaneous monitoring of P53 protein and DNA content of colorectal adenocarcinomas by flow cytometry.

Authors:  Y Remvikos; P Laurent-Puig; R J Salmon; G Frelat; B Dutrillaux; G Thomas
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1990-03-15       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  Cancer case-survival rates for South Australia: a comparison with US rates and a preliminary investigation of time trends.

Authors:  A Bonett; D Roder; A Esterman
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1988-06-06       Impact factor: 7.738

6.  p53-dependent apoptosis modulates the cytotoxicity of anticancer agents.

Authors:  S W Lowe; H E Ruley; T Jacks; D E Housman
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1993-09-24       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Relationship among p53, stage, and prognosis of large bowel cancer.

Authors:  S D Nathanson; M D Linden; P Tender; R J Zarbo; G Jacobsen; L T Nelson
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  N-acetyltransferase polymorphism. Comparison of phenotype and genotype in humans.

Authors:  D Hickman; E Sim
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  1991-08-08       Impact factor: 5.858

9.  Mutant K-ras oncogenes in colon cancers Do not predict Patient's chemotherapy response or survival

Authors: 
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  Diet, acetylator phenotype, and risk of colorectal neoplasia.

Authors:  I C Roberts-Thomson; P Ryan; K K Khoo; W J Hart; A J McMichael; R N Butler
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-05-18       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  7 in total

1.  Genetic polymorphisms in the metabolic pathway and non-Hodgkin lymphoma survival.

Authors:  Xuesong Han; Tongzhang Zheng; Francine M Foss; Qing Lan; Theodore R Holford; Nathaniel Rothman; Shuangge Ma; Yawei Zhang
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 10.047

2.  Inverse relationship between microsatellite instability and K-ras and p53 gene alterations in colon cancer.

Authors:  W S Samowitz; J A Holden; K Curtin; S L Edwards; A R Walker; H A Lin; M A Robertson; M F Nichols; K M Gruenthal; B J Lynch; M F Leppert; M L Slattery
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 3.  A review of the most promising biomarkers in colorectal cancer: one step closer to targeted therapy.

Authors:  Vanessa Deschoolmeester; Marc Baay; Pol Specenier; Filip Lardon; Jan B Vermorken
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2010-06-28

4.  Oncogenetic tree model of somatic mutations and DNA methylation in colon tumors.

Authors:  Carol Sweeney; Kenneth M Boucher; Wade S Samowitz; Roger K Wolff; Hans Albertsen; Karen Curtin; Bette J Caan; Martha L Slattery
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 5.  Molecular lesions in colorectal cancer: impact on prognosis? Original data and review of the literature.

Authors:  B Klump; O Nehls; T Okech; C-J Hsieh; V Gaco; F S Gittinger; M Sarbia; F Borchard; A Greschniok; H H Gruenagel; R Porschen; M Gregor
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2003-06-21       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Detection of p53 gene mutations by nonisotopic RNase cleavage assay as a predictor of poor prognosis in colorectal cancers.

Authors:  Masatoshi Haseba; Shigekazu Hidaka; Takashi Tsuji; Hiroshi Yano; Hideaki Komatsu; Terumitu Sawai; Toru Yasutake; Tohru Nakagoe; Yutaka Tagawa; Hiroyoshi Ayabe
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Statistical strategies to improve the efficiency of molecular studies of colorectal cancer prognosis.

Authors:  P Qu; H Chu; J G Ibrahim; J Peacock; X J Shen; J Tepper; R S Sandler; T O Keku
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 7.640

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.