Literature DB >> 9658516

Response rate according to title and length of questionnaire.

E Lund1, I T Gram.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate how response rates to a postal questionnaire are affected by title and length of the survey instrument. Five questionnaires, which differed according to title and length, were designed. Each questionnaire was mailed to a random sample of one thousand Norwegian women aged, 35-49 years. A total of 3,106 questionnaires were returned (62.1%). The highest response rate (70.2%) was achieved by a two-page questionnaire entitled "Women and Cancer". An otherwise identical questionnaire entitled "Oral Contraceptives and Cancer" had a response rate of 60.7%. Questionnaires entitled "Women and Cancer" with a length of four and six pages had a response rate of 62.8% and 63.3%, respectively. The four page questionnaire entitled "Women, Lifestyle and Health" had the lowest response rate of 57.1%. This study shows that in a general population of Norwegian women the title of a postal questionnaire influences the response rate. The results indicate that although the shortest questionnaire had the highest response rate, the most extensive survey instrument did not have the lowest response rate. The distribution of risk factors for breast cancer did not vary according to response rate or design of questionnaire. The overall findings of this study suggest that the benefits from the increased information obtained from extensive postal questionnaires out-weighs a potential non-response bias due to a somewhat lower response rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9658516     DOI: 10.1177/14034948980260020401

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Soc Med        ISSN: 0300-8037


  19 in total

1.  National health surveys by mail or home interview: effects on response.

Authors:  H S Picavet
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 2.  A systematic literature review on response rates across racial and ethnic populations.

Authors:  Lindsay L Sykes; Robin L Walker; Emmanuel Ngwakongnwi; Hude Quan
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2010 May-Jun

3.  Quality of life in the general Norwegian population, measured by the Quality of Life Scale (QOLS-N).

Authors:  Astrid K Wahl; Tone Rustøen; Berit R Hanestad; Anners Lerdal; Torbjørn Moum
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Costs and effectiveness of a brief MRI examination of patients with acute knee injury.

Authors:  Edwin H G Oei; Jeroen J Nikken; Abida Z Ginai; Gabriel P Krestin; Jan A N Verhaar; Arie B van Vugt; M G Myriam Hunink
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-09-16       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Healthy women's motivators and barriers to participation in a breast cancer cohort study: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Pamela S Sinicrope; Christi A Patten; Sarah M Bonnema; Julka R Almquist; Christina M Smith; Timothy J Beebe; Steven J Jacobsen; Celine M Vachon
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2009-03-09       Impact factor: 3.797

6.  Participation behavior of bladder cancer survivors in a medical follow-up survey on quality of life in France.

Authors:  Tomohiro Matsuda; Hélène Marche; Pascale Grosclaude; Serge Clement
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 8.082

7.  Dairy consumption and calcium intake and risk of breast cancer in a prospective cohort: the Norwegian Women and Cancer study.

Authors:  Anette Hjartåker; Magne Thoresen; Dagrun Engeset; Eiliv Lund
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2010-07-25       Impact factor: 2.506

8.  Important issues to quality of life among norwegian older adults: an exploratory study.

Authors:  Mary Kalfoss; Liv Halvorsrud
Journal:  Open Nurs J       Date:  2009-08-20

Review 9.  Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires.

Authors:  Philip James Edwards; Ian Roberts; Mike J Clarke; Carolyn Diguiseppi; Reinhard Wentz; Irene Kwan; Rachel Cooper; Lambert M Felix; Sarah Pratap
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-07-08

Review 10.  A scoping review about conference objectives and evaluative practices: how do we get more out of them?

Authors:  Justin Neves; John N Lavis; M Kent Ranson
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2012-08-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.