Literature DB >> 9657709

High levels of mercury contamination in multiple media of the Carson River drainage basin of Nevada: implications for risk assessment.

M S Gustin1, G E Taylor, T L Leonard.   

Abstract

Approximately 5.5 x 109 g (4.0 x 105) of mercury was discharged into the Carson River Drainage Basin of west-central Nevada during processing of the gold- and silver-rich Comstock ore in the late 1800s. For the past 13 decades, mercury has been redistributed throughout 500 km2 of the basin, and concentrations are some of the highest reported values in North America. This article documents the concentrations of mercury in the air, water, and substrate at both contaminated and noncontaminated sites within the basin and discusses the implications for risk assessment. At contaminated areas, the range of mercury concentrations are as follows: mill tailings, 3-1610 micrograms/g; unfiltered reservoir water, 53-591 ng/l; atmospheric vapor, 2-294 ng/m3. These values are three to five orders of magnitude greater than natural background. In all media at contaminated sites, concentrations are spatially variable, and air and water mercury concentrations vary temporally. The study are in situated in a natural mercuriferous belt, and regional background mercury concentrations in all environmental media are higher than values typically cited for natural background. As a mercury-contaminated site in North America, the Carson River Drainage Basin is unusual for a number of reasons, including its location in a natural mercuriferous belt, high and sustained levels of anthropogenic mercury inputs, long exposure time, aridity of the climate, and the riparian setting in an arid landscape, where biological activity is concentrated in the same areas that contain high levels of mercury in multiple media.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 9657709      PMCID: PMC1567156          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.94102772

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  4 in total

1.  Methylmercury poisoning in Iraq.

Authors:  F Bakir; S F Damluji; L Amin-Zaki; M Murtadha; A Khalidi; N Y al-Rawi; S Tikriti; H I Dahahir; T W Clarkson; J C Smith; R A Doherty
Journal:  Science       Date:  1973-07-20       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Mercury concentrations in fish from the Great Smoky Mountains National Park.

Authors:  J W Huckabee; C Feldman; Y Talmi
Journal:  Anal Chim Acta       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 6.558

3.  Increasing rates of atmospheric mercury deposition in midcontinental north america.

Authors:  E B Swain; D R Engstrom; M E Brigham; T A Henning; P L Brezonik
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-08-07       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  Mercury and monomethylmercury: present and future concerns.

Authors:  W F Fitzgerald; T W Clarkson
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 9.031

  4 in total
  2 in total

1.  Geochemistry in the modern soil survey program.

Authors:  M A Wilson; R Burt; S J Indorante; A B Jenkins; J V Chiaretti; M G Ulmer; J M Scheyer
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2007-07-11       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Biological monitoring for mercury within a community with soil and fish contamination.

Authors:  M Harnly; S Seidel; P Rojas; R Fornes; P Flessel; D Smith; R Kreutzer; L Goldman
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 9.031

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.