Literature DB >> 9657369

Aerobic and anaerobic energy expenditure during exhaustive ramp exercise.

C B Scott1, G M Bogdanffy.   

Abstract

Ramp tests are often manipulated so that oxygen uptake is able to interpret energy expenditure in its entirety. We hypothesized that oxygen deficits during ramp exercise to exhaustion would be significant, providing a more complete description of the types of energy expenditure available for this mode of testing. Oxygen deficits were obtained during a slow ramp (681 +/- 71 s) and a fast ramp (275 +/- 33 s) to exhaustion. Twelve healthy men (age 35 +/- 3 yrs; VO2max 51 +/- 10 ml x kg(-1) x min(-1)) performed several 10 min submaximal bike rides (at or below ventilatory threshold) to determine work rate -O2 uptake demands. Estimated O2 demands were compared to measured O2 uptake during each ramp test, the difference representing an oxygen deficit. Work levels were controlled and measurements collected with a commercially available electrically braked bike ergometer and metabolic testing system (MedGraphics, Minn., MN). Data were collected and averaged in 30 s time periods, power in watts (W), energy expenditure in cumulative O2 (L). Using a paired t-test, cumulative O2 uptakes were significantly lower (p = 0.0001) when measured O2 uptakes (26.0 L +/- 4.5 for slow ramp; 10.8 L +/- 2.8 for fast ramp) were compared to estimated O2 demands (29.0 L +/- 3.7 for slow ramp; 14.1 L +/- 3.5 for fast ramp). Anaerobic energy expenditures (oxygen deficits) represented 10.8% and 23.4% of total energy expenditure for slow ramps and fast ramps, respectively. Comparisons of the slopes for each test condition revealed significant differences (steady state > slow ramp > fast ramp; p = 0.0001,ANOVA). We conclude that the oxygen deficit during ramp testing represents a significant part of total energy expenditure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9657369     DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-971918

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Sports Med        ISSN: 0172-4622            Impact factor:   3.118


  3 in total

1.  Comparison of the Cosmed K4b(2) portable metabolic system in measuring steady-state walking energy expenditure.

Authors:  Jennifer A Schrack; Eleanor M Simonsick; Luigi Ferrucci
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Contribution of anaerobic energy expenditure to whole body thermogenesis.

Authors:  Christopher B Scott
Journal:  Nutr Metab (Lond)       Date:  2005-06-15       Impact factor: 4.169

Review 3.  The Oxygen Uptake Plateau-A Critical Review of the Frequently Misunderstood Phenomenon.

Authors:  Max Niemeyer; Raphael Knaier; Ralph Beneke
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 11.136

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.