Literature DB >> 9657194

Influence of isoflurane on myogenic motor evoked potentials to single and multiple transcranial stimuli during nitrous oxide/opioid anesthesia.

L H Ubags1, C J Kalkman, H D Been.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Transcranial motor evoked potentials (tc-MEPs) are used to monitor the spinal cord intraoperatively. Volatile anesthetics considerably depress amplitudes of tc-MEPs. This study was undertaken to determine whether multipulse stimulation might overcome this depressant effect.
METHODS: In 10 patients undergoing spinal surgery, incremental doses of isoflurane were added to a nitrous oxide/opioid anesthetic regimen and maintained constant at 0.2, 0.4, and 0.6% end tidal for at least 15 minutes. tc-MEP responses to single-pulse and trains of three and five (interstimulus interval, 2 ms) transcranial electrical stimuli were recorded from the tibialis anterior muscles.
RESULTS: Before the addition of isoflurane, tc-MEPs were recordable in all patients, even with single-pulse stimuli (median amplitude, 428 microV). With 0.2% end-tidal isoflurane, tc-MEPs were recordable in eight patients with single-pulse stimulation and in all patients with three and five successive stimuli. At 0.4% isoflurane, responses were recordable in only one patient using single-pulse stimuli and in all patients using three and five stimuli. With 0.6% isoflurane, tc-MEPs to trains of three and five stimuli were recordable in all patients except one. The amplitude of the responses obtained with 0.2, 0.4, and 0.6% end-tidal isoflurane was significantly smaller than that of control responses (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: These data suggest that despite the powerful depressant effects of isoflurane on myogenic motor responses, tc-MEP monitoring during isoflurane anesthesia may be feasible, provided that multipulse stimulation paradigms are used and the concentration of isoflurane does not exceed 1 minimal anesthetic concentration unit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9657194     DOI: 10.1097/00006123-199807000-00058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  8 in total

1.  Improved neuromonitoring during spinal surgery using double-train transcranial electrical stimulation.

Authors:  H L Journée; H E Polak; M de Kleuver; D D Langeloo; A A Postma
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 2.  Somatosensory evoked potential loss due to intraoperative pulse lavage during spine surgery: case report and review of signal change management.

Authors:  Arun George; Hironobu Hayashi; John F Bebawy; Antoun Koht
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  The effects of isoflurane and propofol on intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during spinal surgery.

Authors:  Zhengyong Chen
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 4.  [Intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring with evoked potentials].

Authors:  R Nitzschke; N Hansen-Algenstaedt; J Regelsberger; A E Goetz; M S Goepfert
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  Evaluation of the applicability of sevoflurane during post-tetanic myogenic motor evoked potential monitoring in patients undergoing spinal surgery.

Authors:  Hironobu Hayashi; Masahiko Kawaguchi; Ryuichi Abe; Yuri Yamamoto; Satoki Inoue; Munehisa Koizumi; Yoshinori Takakura; Hitoshi Furuya
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 6.  Anesthesia and intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in children.

Authors:  Tod Sloan
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 7.  The use of physiological mapping and monitoring during surgery for ependymomas.

Authors:  Rick Abbott
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2009-05-30       Impact factor: 1.475

8.  Neurophysiologic intraoperative monitoring in children with Down syndrome.

Authors:  Akash J Patel; Satish Agadi; Jonathan G Thomas; Robert J Schmidt; Steven W Hwang; Daniel H Fulkerson; Chris D Glover; Andrew Jea
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 1.475

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.