Literature DB >> 9655571

Sex effects on breed of sire differences for birth, weaning, and yearling weights.

L D Van Vleck1, L V Cundiff.   

Abstract

Weights of males and females can be considered to be correlated traits with different averages and variances. This study attempted to determine whether defining traits as expressed in males or in females would change estimates of breed of sire differences needed to calculate across-breed factors for adjustment of within-breed EPD to across-breed EPD. Records from the US Meat Animal Research Center of progeny of Hereford, Angus, and MARC III composite dams mated to 12 sire breeds that had been used to calculate breed of sire adjustments in 1996 were used. Breeds of sire were Hereford, Angus, Shorthorn, Brahman, Simmental, Limousin, Charolais, Maine-Anjou, Gelbvieh, Pinzgauer, Tarentaise, and Salers. Female and male records for birth (BWT), weaning (WWT), and yearling (YWT) weights were considered to be separate although correlated traits. Heritability estimates for expression as females and males were as follows: .44 and .47 for BWT, .25 and .19 for WWT, and .55 and .49 for YWT. Corresponding genetic correlations between expression in males and females were .85, 1.00, and .92. Phenotypic standard deviations were slightly larger and coefficients of variation slightly smaller for males than for females; the largest differences were for YWT. Breeds ranked similarly for female and male weights; the major exception was Brahman for BWT. Averages of breed of sire contrasts for expression in females and males were almost identical to contrasts from analyses of combined male and female records. Largest differences between averaged and combined breed of sire contrasts were approximately 1 kg for BWT and WWT and approximately 2 kg for YWT. The results show that considering male and female weights as separate traits is not needed in calculation of across-breed adjustment factors from US Meat Animal Research Center records.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9655571     DOI: 10.2527/1998.7661528x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  2 in total

1.  Are we underestimating the genetic variances of dimorphic traits?

Authors:  Matthew E Wolak; Derek A Roff; Daphne J Fairbairn
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 2.912

2.  Selection of performance-tested young bulls and indirect responses in commercial beef cattle herds on pasture and in feedlots.

Authors:  Fernanda S S Raidan; Dalinne C C Santos; Mariana M Moraes; Andresa E M Araújo; Henrique T Ventura; José A G Bergmann; Eduardo M Turra; Fabio L B Toral
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 4.297

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.