OBJECTIVE: Peritonitis is considered an acceptable and controllable risk in patients undergoing chronic peritoneal dialysis (PD). In contrast, peritonitis due to visceral leakage represents a true "abdominal catastrophe" because of striking morbidity and mortality. To delineate the incidence, causes, and outcomes of catastrophic peritonitis, we compared patients who developed peritonitis due to documented visceral leakage with patients who developed peritonitis due to enteric organisms without evidence of visceral leakage. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: PD Unit located in tertiary care referral center. PATIENTS: 230 patients treated by PD between January 1988 and June 1996. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: All episodes of PD-related peritonitis occurring over an 8-year period. Hospital course of all patients with or without renal failure who were treated at University Hospitals of Cleveland for ischemic bowel disease, cholecystitis, viscus perforation, or diverticulitis. RESULTS: Anatomically documented visceral injury caused 32.5% of episodes of enteric bacterial peritonitis in 72 patients between January 1988 and June 1996. The overall incidence of this "abdominal catastrophe" was 11.3%, or 26 of a total of 230 patients treated by PD. Of the 26 patients, 50% died, 30.7% survived but switched permanently to hemodialysis, and only 19.2% remained on, or returned to, PD. Compared to renal failure patients treated by hemodialysis or transplantation and to non-renal failure patients, the incidence of abdominal catastrophe was 20-60 times greater in patients treated by PD. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence for injury of an abdominal organ should be sought in all patients treated by PD who develop peritonitis with enteric organisms. Surgical intervention is definitive for diagnosis, and if performed early may reduce morbidity and mortality.
OBJECTIVE:Peritonitis is considered an acceptable and controllable risk in patients undergoing chronic peritoneal dialysis (PD). In contrast, peritonitis due to visceral leakage represents a true "abdominal catastrophe" because of striking morbidity and mortality. To delineate the incidence, causes, and outcomes of catastrophic peritonitis, we compared patients who developed peritonitis due to documented visceral leakage with patients who developed peritonitis due to enteric organisms without evidence of visceral leakage. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING:PD Unit located in tertiary care referral center. PATIENTS: 230 patients treated by PD between January 1988 and June 1996. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: All episodes of PD-related peritonitis occurring over an 8-year period. Hospital course of all patients with or without renal failure who were treated at University Hospitals of Cleveland for ischemic bowel disease, cholecystitis, viscus perforation, or diverticulitis. RESULTS: Anatomically documented visceral injury caused 32.5% of episodes of enteric bacterial peritonitis in 72 patients between January 1988 and June 1996. The overall incidence of this "abdominal catastrophe" was 11.3%, or 26 of a total of 230 patients treated by PD. Of the 26 patients, 50% died, 30.7% survived but switched permanently to hemodialysis, and only 19.2% remained on, or returned to, PD. Compared to renal failurepatients treated by hemodialysis or transplantation and to non-renal failurepatients, the incidence of abdominal catastrophe was 20-60 times greater in patients treated by PD. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence for injury of an abdominal organ should be sought in all patients treated by PD who develop peritonitis with enteric organisms. Surgical intervention is definitive for diagnosis, and if performed early may reduce morbidity and mortality.
Authors: Philip Kam-Tao Li; Cheuk Chun Szeto; Beth Piraino; Javier de Arteaga; Stanley Fan; Ana E Figueiredo; Douglas N Fish; Eric Goffin; Yong-Lim Kim; William Salzer; Dirk G Struijk; Isaac Teitelbaum; David W Johnson Journal: Perit Dial Int Date: 2016-06-09 Impact factor: 1.756