Literature DB >> 9654432

Constraints on sentence priming in the cerebral hemispheres: effects of intervening words in sentences and lists.

M Faust1, C Chiarello.   

Abstract

This study explored the role of syntactic organization on semantic facilitation for target words presented to the right (R) and left (L) visual fields (VFs). Sentence and unstructured list primes were contrasted and, in each condition, the effect of intervening unrelated words on the durability of priming within each VF/hemisphere was investigated. Each prime contained a critical word which occurred Near (one intervening word) or Far (six intervening words) from the target word and was semantically related to it or a neutral control. It was hypothesized that, for word lists, facilitation for RVF target words would decrease with increasing distance between the critical and target words. For sentences no decrease in facilitation was expected for RVF targets. However, for LVF targets, facilitation was expected to decrease with distance both for sentences and lists with no greater priming for sentences than for lists. The results supported these hypotheses. Priming effects that spanned several intervening items were found only when the primes were well-structured, normal sentences and the target words were presented to the RVF. These results suggest that while word-level priming processes are available to both hemispheres, the left hemisphere makes greater use of message-level syntactic and semantic mechanisms for sentence comprehension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9654432     DOI: 10.1006/brln.1997.1941

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Lang        ISSN: 0093-934X            Impact factor:   2.381


  5 in total

1.  Do nonnative language speakers chew the fat and spill the beans with different brain hemispheres? Investigating idiom decomposability with the divided visual field paradigm.

Authors:  Anna B Cieślicka
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2013-12

2.  Age-related shifts in hemispheric dominance for syntactic processing.

Authors:  Michelle Leckey; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Automatic and controlled aspects of lexical associative processing in the two cerebral hemispheres.

Authors:  Padmapriya Kandhadai; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  Hemispheric differences in the recruitment of semantic processing mechanisms.

Authors:  Padmapriya Kandhadai; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Lexical-Semantic Search Under Different Covert Verbal Fluency Tasks: An fMRI Study.

Authors:  Yunqing Li; Ping Li; Qing X Yang; Paul J Eslinger; Chris T Sica; Prasanna Karunanayaka
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 3.558

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.