Literature DB >> 9653591

Application of a diabetes managed care program. The feasibility of using nurses and a computer system to provide effective care.

A L Peters1, M B Davidson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Treatment of patients with diabetes often falls short of recommended process and outcome guidelines. To improve the quality of the provided diabetes care, a program (the Comprehensive Diabetes Care Service [CDCS]) using a computerizing tracking and recall system in conjunction with nurses following protocols was implemented in a managed care setting. The impact of this program was studied and compared to the care provided to patients in another managed care setting. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients followed in the CDCS who completed a diabetes education course were compared with patients followed in a group model health maintenance organization (GMH) who also completed a diabetes education course. CDCS patients received routine care in the program. GMH patients came to the CDCS yearly to have a diabetes evaluation. A chart review was also performed on their GMH outpatient records.
RESULTS: Initial HbA1c levels were higher in the CDCS group than in the GMH group (median of 11.9 vs. 10.0%). In the CDCS patients, HbA1c levels not only fell significantly but were also significantly lower (P < 0.05) than in the GMH patients during the 2nd and 3rd year of follow-up care. There were no significant changes in HbA1c levels in the GMH patients. When CDCS patients were divided into compliant and noncompliant patients, the median HbA1c levels in compliant patients was 8.2%, compared with 11.5% in the noncompliant group. The CDCS patients who needed treatment for hypercholesterolemia were more likely to have a lowering of their cholesterol levels than the GMH patients. All process measures, such as yearly measurement of HbA1c levels, lipid levels, and foot and retinal exams, occurred much more frequently in the CDCS patients.
CONCLUSIONS: The system developed and implemented for managing diabetes improved both outcome and process measures. The comparison group, followed at another managed care setting, received the care consistent with the average (suboptimal) quality of care provided to patients with diabetes in the U.S. Therefore, by using innovative systems of management, the treatment of patients with diabetes can be greatly improved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9653591     DOI: 10.2337/diacare.21.7.1037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


  20 in total

Review 1.  Interventions to improve the management of diabetes mellitus in primary care, outpatient and community settings.

Authors:  C M Renders; G D Valk; S Griffin; E H Wagner; J T Eijk; W J Assendelft
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2001

2.  Nurses as leaders in chronic care.

Authors:  Thomas Bodenheimer; Kate MacGregor; Nancy Stothart
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-03-19

3.  Self-monitoring of blood glucose in type 2 diabetes and long-term outcome: an epidemiological cohort study.

Authors:  S Martin; B Schneider; L Heinemann; V Lodwig; H-J Kurth; H Kolb; W A Scherbaum
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2005-12-17       Impact factor: 10.122

4.  Feasibility of a Telemedicine-Administered, Pharmacist-Staffed, Protocol-Driven, Multicenter Program for Kidney Stone Prevention in a Large Integrated Health Care System: Results of a Pilot Program.

Authors:  Mark E Gasparini; Toby W Chang; Mark St Lezin; John E Skerry; Andy Chan; Krishna A Ramaswamy
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2019-11-01

5.  Clinical outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes managed by a diabetes resource nurse in a primary care practice.

Authors:  Carl Couch; Pamela Sheffield; Tracey Gerthoffer; Andrea Ries; Priscilla Hollander
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2003-07

6.  The Vermont Diabetes Information System (VDIS): study design and subject recruitment for a cluster randomized trial of a decision support system in a regional sample of primary care practices.

Authors:  Charles D MacLean; Benjamin Littenberg; Michael Gagnon; Mimi Reardon; Paul D Turner; Cy Jordan
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.486

7.  Remote monitoring of pain and symptoms using wireless technology in children and adolescents with sickle cell disease.

Authors:  Eufemia Jacob; Joana Duran; Jennifer Stinson; Mary Ann Lewis; Lonnie Zeltzer
Journal:  J Am Assoc Nurse Pract       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 1.165

8.  Effectiveness of diabetes resource nurse case management and physician profiling in a fee-for-service setting: a cluster randomized trial.

Authors:  Jeph Herrin; David A Nicewander; Priscilla A Hollander; Carl E Couch; F David Winter; Ziad R Haydar; Susan S Warren; David J Ballard
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2006-04

9.  Improving diabetes management: structured clinic program for Canadian primary care.

Authors:  Daren Lin; Shirley Hale; Erle Kirby
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.275

10.  Diabetes nurse case management and motivational interviewing for change (DYNAMIC): study design and baseline characteristics in the Chronic Care Model for type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Heather L Stuckey; Cheryl Dellasega; Nora J Graber; David T Mauger; Irina Lendel; Robert A Gabbay
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 2.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.