Literature DB >> 9653131

Reaching the global minimum in docking simulations: a Monte Carlo energy minimization approach using Bezier splines.

J Y Trosset1, H A Scheraga.   

Abstract

The docking problem faces two major challenges: the global optimization of a multivariable function, such as the energy, and the ability to discriminate between true and false positive results, i.e., native from nonnative structures based on the input energy function. Among all energy evaluation tools, only a local energy-minimization method using an accurate enough potential function is able to discriminate between native and nonnative structures. To meet these requirements, a Monte Carlo with energy-minimization method has been incorporated into a new ECEPP/3 docking program. The efficiency of the simulation results from the use of an energy-grid technique based on Bezier splines and from a simplification of the receptor by switching on the energy of only important residues of the active site. Simulations of a thrombin-inhibitor complex show that the global minimum of the energy function was reached in every independent run within less than 3 min of time on an IBM RX 6000 computer. For comparison, 10 standard independent Monte Carlo simulations with 10(6) steps in each were carried out. Only three of them led to a conformation close to the x-ray structure. The latter simulations required an average of 24 min and about 10 hr with and without the grid, respectively. Another important result is that the Bezier spline technique not only speeds up the calculation by reducing the number of operations during the energy evaluation but also helps in reaching the global minimum by smoothing out the potential energy surface.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9653131      PMCID: PMC20920          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.95.14.8011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  36 in total

1.  A robust and efficient automated docking algorithm for molecular recognition.

Authors:  N Kasinos; G A Lilley; N Subbarao; I Haneef
Journal:  Protein Eng       Date:  1992-01

2.  Matching chemistry and shape in molecular docking.

Authors:  B K Shoichet; I D Kuntz
Journal:  Protein Eng       Date:  1993-09

3.  PUZZLE: a new method for automated protein docking based on surface shape complementarity.

Authors:  M Helmer-Citterich; A Tramontano
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1994-01-21       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Fourier-filtered van der Waals contact surfaces: accurate ligand shapes from protein structures.

Authors:  J M Friedman
Journal:  Protein Eng       Date:  1997-08

5.  The Protein Data Bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures.

Authors:  F C Bernstein; T F Koetzle; G J Williams; E F Meyer; M D Brice; J R Rodgers; O Kennard; T Shimanouchi; M Tasumi
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1977-05-25       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Monte Carlo-minimization approach to the multiple-minima problem in protein folding.

Authors:  Z Li; H A Scheraga
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  MONTY: a Monte Carlo approach to protein-DNA recognition.

Authors:  R M Knegtel; J Antoon; C Rullmann; R Boelens; R Kaptein
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1994-01-07       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Molecular recognition of receptor sites using a genetic algorithm with a description of desolvation.

Authors:  G Jones; P Willett; R C Glen
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1995-01-06       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Molecular dynamics simulation of the docking of substrates to proteins.

Authors:  A Di Nola; D Roccatano; H J Berendsen
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1994-07

10.  Rigid-body docking with mutant constraints of influenza hemagglutinin with antibody HC19.

Authors:  J Cherfils; T Bizebard; M Knossow; J Janin
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1994-01
View more
  9 in total

1.  A systematic study of low-resolution recognition in protein--protein complexes.

Authors:  I A Vakser; O G Matar; C F Lam
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-07-20       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Structure of the interferon-receptor complex determined by distance constraints from double-mutant cycles and flexible docking.

Authors:  L C Roisman; J Piehler; J Y Trosset; H A Scheraga; G Schreiber
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-11-06       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Docking of protein models.

Authors:  Andrei Tovchigrechko; Christopher A Wells; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Enhancement of beta-sheet assembly by cooperative hydrogen bonds potential.

Authors:  Ami Levy-Moonshine; El-Ad David Amir; Chen Keasar
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  In silico approach to explore the disruption in the molecular mechanism of human hyaluronidase 1 by mutant E268K that directs Natowicz syndrome.

Authors:  D Meshach Paul; R Rajasekaran
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2016-07-16       Impact factor: 1.733

6.  Experimental and computational studies of the desensitization process in the bovine rhodopsin-arrestin complex.

Authors:  Y Ling; M Ascano; P Robinson; S K Gregurick
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Unraveling the Deleterious Effects of Cancer-Driven STK11 Mutants Through Conformational Sampling Approach.

Authors:  Merlin Lopus; D Meshach Paul; R Rajasekaran
Journal:  Cancer Inform       Date:  2016-04-04

8.  Protein docking refinement by convex underestimation in the low-dimensional subspace of encounter complexes.

Authors:  Shahrooz Zarbafian; Mohammad Moghadasi; Athar Roshandelpoor; Feng Nan; Keyong Li; Pirooz Vakli; Sandor Vajda; Dima Kozakov; Ioannis Ch Paschalidis
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Protein docking by the underestimation of free energy funnels in the space of encounter complexes.

Authors:  Yang Shen; Ioannis Ch Paschalidis; Pirooz Vakili; Sandor Vajda
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2008-10-10       Impact factor: 4.475

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.