Literature DB >> 9652912

Acute urinary morbidity following I-125 interstitial implantation of the prostate gland.

J Desai1, R G Stock, N N Stone, C Iannuzzi, J K DeWyngaert.   

Abstract

The objective of this paper was to evaluate the acute urinary morbidity associated with I-125 interstitial implantation of the prostate gland. From 1991-1995, 117 patients underwent ultrasound (U/S)-guided implantation of the prostate gland. Median dose to 90% of the gland (d90) was 14.68 Gy (range = 1.65-21.75 Gy). The patients' urinary symptoms were recorded pre-implantation and at regular intervals after implantation using the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), a self-assessment questionnaire in which patients scored 7 symptoms: incomplete emptying, frequency, intermittency, urgency, weak stream, straining, and nocturia. Median follow-up was 12 months. The natural history of implant-related urinary symptoms was assessed in this manner. In addition, dosimetric factors including U/S prostate volume, total activity, activity per seed, dose volume histogram (DVH) values for dose to gland, and dose area histogram (DAH) values for dose to urethra and bladder were examined for correlation to the severity of each symptom as well as to total IPSS (sum of the individual symptom scores). Total IPSS peaked at 1 month post-implant and gradually returned to approximately baseline at 24 months. Total IPSS directly correlated with total activity and DVH for the prostate. Total IPSS, however, did not correlate with bladder or urethral DAH. With the exception of frequency, individual symptoms did not correlate with dose to gland, bladder, or urethra. Frequency scores did, however, correlate not only with dose to prostate gland but also dose to urethra. The acute urinary side effects of I-125 prostate implantation are transient and peak at 1 month post-implant. The severity of the urinary irritative symptoms developed are closely related to total dose to the gland. Urethral dose appears to affect frequency most significantly. Urinary symptoms, therefore, may be a limiting factor when considering dose escalation with I-125.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9652912     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6823(1998)6:3<135::AID-ROI4>3.0.CO;2-Z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Oncol Investig        ISSN: 1065-7541


  17 in total

1.  Clinical efficacy of combination therapy with an alpha blocker and low-dose sildenafil on post-therapy lower urinary tract symptoms after low-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Young Dong Yu; Moon Hyung Kang; Chang Il Choi; Hyun Soo Shin; Jong Jin Oh; Dong Soo Park
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Permanent prostate brachytherapy: the significance of postimplant dosimetry.

Authors:  W Robert Lee
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2004

3.  Comparison of urethral diameters for calculating the urethral dose after permanent prostate brachytherapy.

Authors:  Osamu Tanaka; Shinya Hayashi; Masayuki Matsuo; Masahiro Nakano; Yasuaki Kubota; Sunaho Maeda; Kazuhiro Ohtakara; Takashi Deguchi; Hiroaki Hoshi
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2007-08-27

4.  Does combination therapy with tamsulosin and trospium chloride improve lower urinary tract symptoms after SEEDS brachytherapy for prostate cancer compared with tamsulosin alone? : A prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Miao Yan; Peng Xue; Kunpeng Wang; Guojun Gao; Wei Zhang; Fanghu Sun
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 3.621

5.  Secondary effects and biochemical control in patients with early prostate cancer treated with (125)-I seeds.

Authors:  V Morillo; J L Guinot; I Tortajada; J V Ricós; L Arribas; M Maroñas; M Estornell; J Casanova
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 6.  [Curative radiotherapy of localized prostate cancer. Treatment methods and results].

Authors:  R Schwarz
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 7.  Permanent interstitial brachytherapy for prostate cancer: a current review.

Authors:  Jeffrey Woolsey; Nicole Miller; Dan Theodorescu
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2003-08-13       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Progressive transition from pre-planned to intraoperative optimizing seed implant: post implementation analysis.

Authors:  Hsiang-Chi Kuo; William Bodner; Ravindra Yaparpalvi; Chandan Guha; Bhupendra M Tolia; Keyur J Mehta; Dennis Mah; Shalom Kalnicki
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2012-03-30

Review 9.  Permanent seed implantation for localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate.

Authors:  Nelson N Stone; Richard G Stock
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.862

10.  Prospective longitudinal comparative study of health-related quality of life and treatment satisfaction in patients treated with hormone therapy, radical retropubic prostatectomy, and high or low dose rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sotaro Miwa; Atsushi Mizokami; Hiroyuki Konaka; Satoru Ueno; Yasuhide Kitagawa; Eitetsu Koh; Mikio Namiki
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2013-09-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.