Literature DB >> 9652511

The value of imaging in the diagnosis and treatment of bone tumors.

M Campanacci1, M Mercuri, A Gasbarrini, L Campanacci.   

Abstract

The authors report their experience in the diagnosis of bone tumors at the Rizzoli Institute of Bologna. The main imaging techniques used to this purpose are conventional radiography, CT, MRI, and isotope bone scan. Angiography is rarely used. Conventional radiography is the examination of choice and is sufficient in several benign lesions not requiring treatment. Supplementary imaging studies are usually needed when radiographic findings are questionable and/or the lesion requires treatment. When a biopsy is required, it should be carried out after a complete imaging work-up, which sometimes allows a correct prebiopsy diagnosis, indicates the biopsy modality, approach and site, and is also mandatory to stage the tumor, plan the surgical approach and technique, and show in the finest details the occult tumor spread. CT best shows mineralized tissues and pulmonary metastases. It is also frequently used as a guide for needle biopsies. MRI beautifully shows the different tissues and compartments and it is particularly sensitive in depicting fat. Moreover, it can be repeated many times, even in pregnant women, because it needs no ionizing radiations and iodinated contrast; it is also free of artifacts in the patients with orthopedic devices which are usually nonferromagnetic. However, the execution of an adequate MRI requires experience and knowledge of bone pathologic conditions. Bone scan helps in detecting any 'active' area in the bone. It can be thus useful to depict lesion quiescence or activity and to stage any tumor which can metastasize to the skeleton. Bone scan is also helpful to show bone lesions when they are not visible on plain radiographs and indicates the tumor response to preoperative chemotherapy. Angiography is helpful when a preoperative selective embolization is needed, or when complex vertebral surgery or vascular surgery are planned. The bad outcome of bone tumors often depends on incomplete, inadequate or misinterpretated imaging findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9652511     DOI: 10.1016/s0720-048x(98)00052-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  3 in total

1.  Solitary bone tumor imaging reporting and data system (BTI-RADS): initial assessment of a systematic imaging evaluation and comprehensive reporting method.

Authors:  Guilherme Jaquet Ribeiro; Romain Gillet; Gabriela Hossu; Jean-Michel Trinh; Eve Euxibie; François Sirveaux; Alain Blum; Pedro Augusto Gondim Teixeira
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Percutaneous radiofrequency coagulation of osteoid osteoma of the "Neural Spinal Ring".

Authors:  Elie I Samaha; Ismat B Ghanem; Ronald F Moussa; Khalil E Kharrat; Nabil M Okais; Fernand M Dagher
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-03-03       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Perspectives of primary health care physicians on diagnosing and referring patients with apparent osteolytic lesions on plain X-ray films: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Ali Alyami; Yasser Alshomrani; Rayyan Suqaty; Shaddy Futtiny; Faisal Alnaqib; Muath Albarakati; Ahmad Alhazmi
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2016-03-07
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.