Literature DB >> 9651288

Temporary pacing before permanent pacing should be avoided unless essential.

D J Hildick-Smith, M C Petch.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  1998        PMID： 9651288      PMCID： PMC1113470          DOI： 10.1136/bmj.317.7150.79a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN： 0959-8138


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

Review 1.  Central venous air embolism causing pulmonary oedema mimicking left ventricular failure.

Authors:  A Fitchet; A P Fitzpatrick
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-02-21

2.  Early complications after dual chamber versus single chamber pacemaker implantation.

Authors:  A Chauhan; A A Grace; S A Newell; D L Stone; L M Shapiro; P M Schofield; M C Petch
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 1.976

3.  Complications with retained transvenous pacemaker electrodes.

Authors:  G Rettig; P Doenecke; S Sen; I Volkmer; L Bette
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 4.749

4.  Early complications of permanent pacemaker implantation: no difference between dual and single chamber systems.

Authors:  R K Aggarwal; D T Connelly; S G Ray; J Ball; R G Charles
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1995-06

5.  Clinical problems with temporary pacemakers prior to permanent pacing.

Authors:  S Winner; N Boon
Journal:  J R Coll Physicians Lond       Date:  1989-07
  5 in total
  2 in total

1.  Problems with temporary cardiac pacing. Expecting trainees in medicine to perform transvenous pacing is no longer acceptable.

Authors:  J J Murphy
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-09-08

2.  Complications associated with the use of temporary pacemaker in patients waiting for definitive device implantation.

Authors:  Silvana Ellen Ribeiro Papp; Aymée Lustosa Nogueira E Torres; Andres Eduardo Larrovere Vasquez; Luciana Gioli-Pereira
Journal:  Einstein (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2022-06-24
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.