Literature DB >> 9651266

Influence of social problems on management in general practice: multipractice questionnaire survey.

P Gulbrandsen1, P Fugelli, L Sandvik, P Hjortdahl.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To find how often social problems influence clinical management in general practice, how management is changed, and how the characteristics of patients, doctors, and the doctor-patient relationship influence this management.
DESIGN: Multipractice survey of patients consulting general practitioners. Doctors completed a questionnaire for each patient.
SETTING: General practices in Buskerud county, Norway.
SUBJECTS: 1401 consecutive adult patients attending 89 general practitioners. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: How often management of patients was influenced by different types of social problem and main reasons for consultation; frequency and intercorrelation of different types of management applied; odds ratios for social problems' influence on management, controlled for by characteristics of doctors, patients, and their relationship.
RESULTS: In 17% of all consultations the doctors' knowledge of patients' social problems influenced their management, stressful working conditions being the most frequent influencing type of problem. Knowledge of social problems influenced management more often when the doctor knew a patient well, but less often the longer a doctor had worked in a practice. When social problems influenced management, the commonest types of management offered were extra time for consultation (51%), advice (42%), authorisation of sick leave (28%), and prescription of a psychotropic drug (20%), while referral to community services was used in 2.6% of these consultations. Prescription of a psychotropic drug was positively correlated with use of extra time, and was made more often by female doctors.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients' social problems influenced choice of management in at least a sixth of consultations. Prior knowledge of the patient, the doctor's time in present practice, age and sex of the patient, and sex of the doctor significantly influenced management of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9651266      PMCID: PMC28599          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.317.7150.28

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  14 in total

1.  What does a doctor do with psychosocial problems in primary care?

Authors:  P F Verhaak; H J Wennink
Journal:  Int J Psychiatry Med       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.210

2.  The influence of patient and physician gender on prescription of psychotropic drugs.

Authors:  A Morabia; J Fabre; J P Dunand
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Physicians' knowledge of and response to patients' problems.

Authors:  M A Stewart; C W Buck
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  A study of the preferences of family practitioners and other primary care physicians in treating patients' psychosocial problems.

Authors:  M Gropper
Journal:  Soc Work Health Care       Date:  1987

5.  [Physician's role in certification for sick leave]].

Authors:  B A Larsen; O H Førde; G Tellnes
Journal:  Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen       Date:  1994-05-10

6.  The impact of discussion of non-medical problems in the physician's office.

Authors:  F J Martin; M J Bass
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 2.267

7.  Factors associated with consultation length and characteristics of short and long consultations.

Authors:  S O Andersson; S Ferry; B Mattsson
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.581

8.  Factors influencing doctors' awareness of the life problems of middle-aged patients.

Authors:  M J Yaffe; M A Stewart
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Clinicians' knowledge about the families of their patients.

Authors:  E E Rosenberg; I B Pless
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 2.267

10.  Continuity of care: influence of general practitioners' knowledge about their patients on use of resources in consultations.

Authors:  P Hjortdahl; C F Borchgrevink
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-11-09
View more
  9 in total

1.  Tackling health inequalities in primary care.

Authors:  L Smeeth; I Heath
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-04-17

2.  Continuity of care--going out of style?

Authors:  P Hjortdahl
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Detection of patient psychological distress and longitudinal patient-doctor relationships: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Matthew Ridd; Glyn Lewis; Tim J Peters; Chris Salisbury
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Patient involvement in assessing consultation quality: a quantitative study of the Patient Enablement Instrument in Poland.

Authors:  Teresa R B Pawlikowska; Jeremy J Walker; Pawel R Nowak; Wieslawa Szumilo-Grzesik
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  How GPs in Norway conceptualise functional ability: a focus group study.

Authors:  Kariann Krohne; Søren Brage
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Social problems, primary care and pathways to help and support: addressing health inequalities at the individual level. Part I: the GP perspective.

Authors:  Jennie Popay; Ute Kowarzik; Sara Mallinson; Sara Mackian; Jacqui Barker
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.710

7.  Family outreach and empowerment program: Health promotion model for medical students.

Authors:  Rizma Adlia Syakurah; Shabrina Yunita Adzani; Alzena Dwi Saltike; Dhiya Silvi Ramadhini
Journal:  J Educ Health Promot       Date:  2018-05-03

8.  The Effects of Physicians' Communication and Empathy Ability on Physician-Patient Relationship from Physicians' and Patients' Perspectives.

Authors:  Yanjiao Wang; Qing Wu; Yao Wang; Pei Wang
Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings       Date:  2022-01-28

9.  Identifying patients with psychosocial problems in general practice: a scoping review protocol.

Authors:  Rosemarie Schwenker; Eric Sven Kroeber; Tobias Deutsch; Thomas Frese; Susanne Unverzagt
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 2.692

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.