Literature DB >> 9650693

LE or not LE--that is the question: an unsuccessful attempt to separate lymphocytic infiltration from the spectrum of discoid lupus erythematosus.

W Weyers1, M Bonczkowitz, I Weyers.   

Abstract

Lymphocytic infiltration of the skin (LIS) has been claimed to be a distinct entity that differs from discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) by the lack of epidermal changes, negative immunofluorescence tests, and differences in the composition of the inflammatory cell infiltrate. In studies that sought to distinguish both conditions, however, cases of established lupus erythematosus without epidermal involvement have not been considered. We studied 72 patients with the clinical and histopathologic diagnosis of either LIS or DLE in regard to the same clinical, histopathologic, immunofluorescence, and immunohistochemical criteria. No significant differences were noted between cases with and without epidermal involvement on the one hand and between cases with and without immunofluorescence or clinical findings suggestive of lupus erythematosus on the other. Based on our findings, it is not possible to separate LIS from the spectrum of DLE.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9650693     DOI: 10.1097/00000372-199806000-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Dermatopathol        ISSN: 0193-1091            Impact factor:   1.533


  3 in total

1.  [Extreme photosensitivity since childhood].

Authors:  A Kuhn; S Hanneken; M Megahed; T Ruzicka; N J Neumann
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 0.751

2.  [Palpable arciforme migratory erythema].

Authors:  G Wagner; S Bartsch; C Rose; M M Sachse
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 0.751

3.  Lupus erythematosus tumidus: clinical perspectives.

Authors:  Nikolaos Patsinakidis; Ocko Kautz; Bernhard F Gibbs; Ulrike Raap
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol       Date:  2019-10-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.