Literature DB >> 9650173

Photon beam skin dose analyses for different clinical setups.

S Kim1, C R Liu, T C Zhu, J R Palta.   

Abstract

A comprehensive set of data on skin dose for 8 MV and 18 MV photon beams from a medical linear accelerator was measured using a parallel-plate chamber to document the effect of field size, source-to-surface distance (SSD), off-axis distance, acrylic block tray, wedge (external standard wedge), Lipowitz's metal block, multileaf collimator (MLC), and dynamic wedge. The skin dose increased as field size increased from 5 X 5 cm2 to 40 X 40 cm2 (6% to 38% for 8 MV and 5% to 44% for 18 MV beam). With the use of an acrylic block tray, the skin dose increased for all field sizes (7% to 59% for 8 MV and 5% to 62% for 18 MV beam), but the increase was minimal for small fields. The skin dose with a wedge showed a much more complex trend. It was generally lower than the dose for an open field, but higher in the case of large fields and higher degree wedges. When both wedge and block tray were used, the tray was a major contributor to the skin dose because some of the contaminant electrons from the wedge assembly were absorbed by the block tray. Field-shaping blocks increased the skin dose, but, interestingly, the block tray reduced the skin dose for small blocked fields treated with a high-energy photon beam. The effect of an MLC on skin dose was very similar to that of a Lipowitz's metal block, but its magnitude was less. The skin dose was higher for dynamic wedge fields than it was for standard wedge fields. As SSD decreased, the skin dose increased, and this effect was dominant in larger field sizes. The SSD effect was enhanced in the presence of an acrylic block tray. The skin dose off-axis was the same as at the central axis, or smaller. A similar pattern of behavior of the skin dose is expected for photon beams from other linear accelerators.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9650173     DOI: 10.1118/1.598261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  16 in total

1.  Comparison of 4 MV photon surface dose among Varian, Siemens, and Elekta linear accelerators for tangential breast treatment: a phantom study.

Authors:  Satoshi Yamaguchi; Kumiko Karasawa; Tomohisa Furuya; Takayuki Fujita; Yutaka Tutumi; Kohei Miura; Takahiro Takada; Kana Ito; Shuichi Ozawa
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2007-01-25

2.  Effect of a carbon fiber tabletop on the surface dose and attenuation for high-energy photon beams.

Authors:  Tülay P Meydanci; Gönül Kemikler
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2008-11-22

3.  Comparison of surface dose delivered by 7 MV-unflattened and 6 MV-flattened photon beams.

Authors:  Ashokkumar Sigamani; Arunai Nambiraj
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2017-04-25

4.  Surface dose and build-up region measurements with wedge filters for 6 and 18 MV photon beams.

Authors:  Hatice Bilge; Nurdan Ozbek; Murat Okutan; Aydin Cakir; Hilal Acar
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 2.374

5.  Effect of various physical parameters on surface and build-up dose for 15-MV X-rays.

Authors:  Girigesh Yadav; R S Yadav; Alok Kumar
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2010-10

6.  Surface buildup dose dependence on photon field delivery technique for IMRT.

Authors:  Shigeru Yokoyama; Peter L Roberson; Dale W Litzenberg; Jean M Moran; Benedick A Fraass
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Skin dose estimation for various beam modifiers and source-to-surface distances for 6MV photons.

Authors:  Girigesh Yadav; R S Yadav; Alok Kumar
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2009-04

8.  Skin dose during radiotherapy: a summary and general estimation technique.

Authors:  Stephen F Kry; Susan A Smith; Rita Weathers; Marilyn Stovall
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Beam perturbation characteristics of a 2D transmission silicon diode array, Magic Plate.

Authors:  Ziyad A Alrowaili; Michael L F Lerch; Marco Petasecca; Martin G Carolan; Peter E Metcalfe; Anatoly B Rosenfeld
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Surface dose variations in 6 and 10 MV flattened and flattening filter-free (FFF) photon beams.

Authors:  Jason Cashmore
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.