Literature DB >> 9649547

On the sampling variance of intraclass correlations and genetic correlations.

P M Visscher1.   

Abstract

Widely used standard expressions for the sampling variance of intraclass correlations and genetic correlation coefficients were reviewed for small and large sample sizes. For the sampling variance of the intraclass correlation, it was shown by simulation that the commonly used expression, derived using a first-order Taylor series performs better than alternative expressions found in the literature, when the between-sire degrees of freedom were small. The expressions for the sampling variance of the genetic correlation are significantly biased for small sample sizes, in particular when the population values, or their estimates, are close to zero. It was shown, both analytically and by simulation, that this is because the estimate of the sampling variance becomes very large in these cases due to very small values of the denominator of the expressions. It was concluded, therefore, that for small samples, estimates of the heritabilities and genetic correlations should not be used in the expressions for the sampling variance of the genetic correlation. It was shown analytically that in cases where the population values of the heritabilities are known, using the estimated heritabilities rather than their true values to estimate the genetic correlation results in a lower sampling variance for the genetic correlation. Therefore, for large samples, estimates of heritabilities, and not their true values, should be used.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9649547      PMCID: PMC1460220     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  1 in total

1.  Realized sampling variances of estimates of genetic parameters and the difference between genetic and phenotypic correlations.

Authors:  K R Koots; J P Gibson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 4.562

  1 in total
  10 in total

1.  Full-genome scan for linkage in 50 families segregating the bipolar affective disease phenotype.

Authors:  C Friddle; R Koskela; K Ranade; J Hebert; M Cargill; C D Clark; M McInnis; S Simpson; F McMahon; O C Stine; D Meyers; J Xu; D MacKinnon; T Swift-Scanlan; K Jamison; S Folstein; M Daly; L Kruglyak; T Marr; J R DePaulo; D Botstein
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Standard error of the genetic correlation: how much data do we need to estimate a purebred-crossbred genetic correlation?

Authors:  Piter Bijma; John W M Bastiaansen
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 4.297

3.  Assessment of sire contribution and breed-of-origin of alleles in a three-way crossbred broiler dataset.

Authors:  Mario P L Calus; Jérémie Vandenplas; Ina Hulsegge; Randy Borg; John M Henshall; Rachel Hawken
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Bias-corrected estimator for intraclass correlation coefficient in the balanced one-way random effects model.

Authors:  Eshetu G Atenafu; Jemila S Hamid; Teresa To; Andrew R Willan; Brian M Feldman; Joseph Beyene
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 4.615

5.  Reliable confidence intervals in quantitative genetics: narrow-sense heritability.

Authors:  Thomas Fabbro; Anthony C Davison; Thomas Steinger
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 5.574

6.  Phenotypic plasticity, QTL mapping and genomic characterization of bud set in black poplar.

Authors:  Francesco Fabbrini; Muriel Gaudet; Catherine Bastien; Giusi Zaina; Antoine Harfouche; Isacco Beritognolo; Nicolas Marron; Michele Morgante; Giuseppe Scarascia-Mugnozza; Maurizio Sabatti
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 4.215

7.  Substantial heritable variation for susceptibility to Dothistroma septosporum within populations of native British Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris).

Authors:  A Perry; W Wachowiak; A V Brown; R A Ennos; J E Cottrell; S Cavers
Journal:  Plant Pathol       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 2.590

8.  A unified framework for association and prediction from vertex-wise grey-matter structure.

Authors:  Baptiste Couvy-Duchesne; Lachlan T Strike; Futao Zhang; Yan Holtz; Zhili Zheng; Kathryn E Kemper; Loic Yengo; Olivier Colliot; Margaret J Wright; Naomi R Wray; Jian Yang; Peter M Visscher
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Statistical power to detect genetic (co)variance of complex traits using SNP data in unrelated samples.

Authors:  Peter M Visscher; Gibran Hemani; Anna A E Vinkhuyzen; Guo-Bo Chen; Sang Hong Lee; Naomi R Wray; Michael E Goddard; Jian Yang
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Has Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) co-evolved with Dothistroma septosporum in Scotland? Evidence for spatial heterogeneity in the susceptibility of native provenances.

Authors:  Annika Perry; Anna V Brown; Stephen Cavers; Joan E Cottrell; Richard A Ennos
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 5.183

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.