Literature DB >> 9649532

Loss of notum macrochaetae as an interspecific hybrid anomaly between Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans.

T S Takano1.   

Abstract

With the aim of revealing genetic variation accumulated among closely related species during the course of evolution, this study focuses on loss of macrochaetae on the notum as one of the developmental anomalies seen in interspecific hybrids between Drosophila melanogaster and its closely related species. Interspecific hybrids between a line of D. melanogaster and D. simulans isofemale lines exhibited a wide range in the number of missing bristles. By contrast, D. mauritiana and D. sechellia lines showed almost no reduction in bristle number in hybrids with D. melanogaster. Genetic analysis showed that the D. simulans X chromosome confers a large effect on hybrid bristle loss, although X-autosome interaction may be involved. This suggests that at least one genetic factor contributing to hybrid anomalies arose recently on a D. simulans X chromosome. Moreover, the results indicate sex dependency: the male hybrids were more susceptible to bristle loss than the female hybrids were. Use of cell type markers suggests that the defect does not lie in cell fate decisions during bristle development, but in the maintenance of neural fate and/or differentiation of the descendants of sensory mother cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9649532      PMCID: PMC1460221     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  34 in total

1.  Genetic Studies on DROSOPHILA SIMULANS. I. Introduction. Hybrids with DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER.

Authors:  A H Sturtevant
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1920-09       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  The Bristles of Hybrids between DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER and DROSOPHILA SIMULANS.

Authors:  R L Biddle
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1932-03       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  A genetic basis for the inviability of hybrids between sibling species of Drosophila.

Authors:  P Hutter; J Roote; M Ashburner
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Models of evolution of reproductive isolation.

Authors:  M Nei; T Maruyama; C I Wu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  extramacrochaetae, a negative regulator of sensory organ development in Drosophila, defines a new class of helix-loop-helix proteins.

Authors:  H M Ellis; D R Spann; J W Posakony
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1990-04-06       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  The Drosophila extramacrochaetae locus, an antagonist of proneural genes that, like these genes, encodes a helix-loop-helix protein.

Authors:  J Garrell; J Modolell
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1990-04-06       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  A genome-wide survey of hybrid incompatibility factors by the introgression of marked segments of Drosophila mauritiana chromosomes into Drosophila simulans.

Authors:  J R True; B S Weir; C C Laurie
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Hybrid lethal systems in the Drosophila melanogaster species complex. II. The Zygotic hybrid rescue (Zhr) gene of D. melanogaster.

Authors:  K Sawamura; M T Yamamoto; T K Watanabe
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Genetics of reproductive isolation in the Drosophila simulans clade: complex epistasis underlying hybrid male sterility.

Authors:  E L Cabot; A W Davis; N A Johnson; C I Wu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Patterns of expression of cut, a protein required for external sensory organ development in wild-type and cut mutant Drosophila embryos.

Authors:  K Blochlinger; R Bodmer; L Y Jan; Y N Jan
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 11.361

View more
  10 in total

1.  Genetic screens for factors involved in the notum bristle loss of interspecific hybrids between Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans.

Authors:  T Takano-Shimizu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Genetic analysis of speciation by means of introgression into Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  K Sawamura; A W Davis; C I Wu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-03-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Cryptic genetic variation: evolution's hidden substrate.

Authors:  Annalise B Paaby; Matthew V Rockman
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  The Loci of Behavioral Evolution: Evidence That Fas2 and tilB Underlie Differences in Pupation Site Choice Behavior between Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans.

Authors:  Alison Pischedda; Michael P Shahandeh; Thomas L Turner
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 16.240

5.  Nup96-dependent hybrid lethality occurs in a subset of species from the simulans clade of Drosophila.

Authors:  Daniel A Barbash
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Ninety years of Drosophila melanogaster hybrids.

Authors:  Daniel A Barbash
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  High genetic differentiation between an African and a non-African strain of Drosophila simulans revealed by segregation distortion and reduced crossover frequency.

Authors:  Haruki Tatsuta; Toshiyuki Takano-Shimizu
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 1.082

Review 8.  Use with caution: developmental systems divergence and potential pitfalls of animal models.

Authors:  Vincent J Lynch
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2009-06

9.  The genetics of ray pattern variation in Caenorhabditis briggsae.

Authors:  Scott Everet Baird; Cynthia R Davidson; Justin C Bohrer
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2005-01-05       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  Divergent mechanisms regulate conserved cardiopharyngeal development and gene expression in distantly related ascidians.

Authors:  Alberto Stolfi; Elijah K Lowe; Claudia Racioppi; Filomena Ristoratore; C Titus Brown; Billie J Swalla; Lionel Christiaen
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 8.140

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.