L A Levine1, E W Lisek. 1. Department of Urology, Rush-Presbyterian St. Luke's Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We evaluated the safety and efficacy of percutaneous sperm aspiration from the epididymis or testicle as a diagnostic technique to confirm sperm production and as a therapeutic technique to harvest sperm for use in intracytoplasmic sperm injection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We present our experience with 69 sperm aspiration procedures in men considered to have nonreconstructible obstructive azoospermia. This short outpatient procedure was performed using a butterfly needle with the patient under intravenous sedation and local anesthesia. RESULTS: Of the 32 diagnostic aspirations 20 demonstrated mature and motile sperm, 9 maturation arrest and 3 germ cell aplasia. In 35 of 37 therapeutic sperm aspirations (95%) adequate samples of sperm after processing (mean of 5.4 million) were obtained. Of 24 epididymal aspirations 13 (54%) had sufficient residual sperm for cryopreservation of 1 to 5 vials (mean 2.5) containing an average of 170,000 sperm per vial. In the 32 intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles 221 of 392 eggs (56.3%) fertilized (2PN) and 6 resulted in ongoing pregnancies (21.4% per transfer). There have been no acute or chronic complications in this patient population. Ten men underwent a second successful aspiration procedure for intracytoplasmic sperm injection and 3 underwent a third aspiration without added difficulty. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous epididymal or testis sperm aspiration is a minimally invasive sperm retrieval technique and appears to be an effective alternative to microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration, which is more invasive, costly and technically difficult.
PURPOSE: We evaluated the safety and efficacy of percutaneous sperm aspiration from the epididymis or testicle as a diagnostic technique to confirm sperm production and as a therapeutic technique to harvest sperm for use in intracytoplasmic sperm injection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We present our experience with 69 sperm aspiration procedures in men considered to have nonreconstructible obstructive azoospermia. This short outpatient procedure was performed using a butterfly needle with the patient under intravenous sedation and local anesthesia. RESULTS: Of the 32 diagnostic aspirations 20 demonstrated mature and motile sperm, 9 maturation arrest and 3 germ cell aplasia. In 35 of 37 therapeutic sperm aspirations (95%) adequate samples of sperm after processing (mean of 5.4 million) were obtained. Of 24 epididymal aspirations 13 (54%) had sufficient residual sperm for cryopreservation of 1 to 5 vials (mean 2.5) containing an average of 170,000 sperm per vial. In the 32 intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles 221 of 392 eggs (56.3%) fertilized (2PN) and 6 resulted in ongoing pregnancies (21.4% per transfer). There have been no acute or chronic complications in this patient population. Ten men underwent a second successful aspiration procedure for intracytoplasmic sperm injection and 3 underwent a third aspiration without added difficulty. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous epididymal or testis sperm aspiration is a minimally invasive sperm retrieval technique and appears to be an effective alternative to microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration, which is more invasive, costly and technically difficult.