Literature DB >> 9649246

Evaluation of NMP22 in the detection of transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder.

D S Stampfer1, G A Carpinito, J Rodriguez-Villanueva, L W Willsey, C P Dinney, H B Grossman, H A Fritsche, W S McDougal.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Urinary nuclear matrix protein (NMP22) was evaluated for detection of new and recurrent bladder tumors in patients with a history of transitional cell carcinoma. Our objective was to determine sensitivity and specificity of this marker for tumors of various stages and grades, as well as its use as an adjunct to or substitute for urinary cytology.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 231 patients with a history of transitional cell carcinoma provided 288 voided urine samples before cystoscopic examination at 1 of 3 institutions (53 patients were reevaluated at least once). Urine samples were assayed for NMP22 using the NMP22 Test Kit. Select patients underwent biopsy with appropriate additional therapy. Voided urinary cytology was obtained in 200 cases. End points for determination of the absence and presence of tumor were negative cystoscopy and positive biopsy, respectively. A receiver operating characteristics curve was constructed to determine the optimal NMP22 threshold for detection of transitional cell carcinoma. For positive biopsies NMP22 values were also correlated with tumor stage and grade. Comparison to cytology was limited to patients with complete data.
RESULTS: There were 208 negative cystoscopies (158 with cytology) and 66 positive cystoscopies with biopsy (42 with cytology). Of the cases 14 were eliminated from statistical analysis due to incomplete data. Receiver operating characteristics curve interpretation determined that 6.4 units per ml. was an optimal reference value for detection of transitional cell carcinoma in this patient group. Sensitivity and specificity for all pathological groupings was 68 and 80%, respectively. When compared to cytology the sensitivities of NMP22 and cytology were 67 versus 31 or 40% (depending on the definition of positive cytology).
CONCLUSIONS: NMP22 values represented significant improvement over urinary cytology for detection of transitional cell carcinoma. The sensitivity of NMP22 for detection of transitional cell carcinoma in bladder cancer patients was as much as twice that of cytology when a reference value of 6.4 units per ml. was used. NMP22 analysis was less costly than cytology and operator independent. While NMP22 has previously been shown to be a strong predictor of recurrence after tumor resection, it is an effective and sensitive screening test for detecting tumors in patients with transitional cell carcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9649246     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)63930-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  17 in total

1.  Urine cytology and adjunct markers for detection and surveillance of bladder cancer.

Authors:  Peggy S Sullivan; Jessica B Chan; Mary R Levin; Jianyu Rao
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2010-07-25       Impact factor: 4.060

2.  Bladder cancer 2000: molecular markers for the diagnosis of transitional cell carcinoma.

Authors:  D Chao; S J Freedland; A J Pantuck; A Zisman; A S Belldegrun
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2001

3.  Assessing the clinical benefit of nuclear matrix protein 22 in the surveillance of patients with nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer and negative cytology: a decision-curve analysis.

Authors:  Shahrokh F Shariat; Caroline Savage; Thomas F Chromecki; Maxine Sun; Douglas S Scherr; Richard K Lee; Giovanni Lughezzani; Mesut Remzi; Michael J Marberger; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Andrew J Vickers
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-01-10       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Comparison of the nuclear matrix protein 22 with voided urine cytology in the diagnosis of transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder.

Authors:  Murat Lekili; Ercüment Sener; Mehmet Akif Demir; Gökhan Temeltaş; Talha Müezzinoğlu; Coşkun Büyüksu
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2003-12-19

5.  Critical evaluation of urinary markers for bladder cancer detection and monitoring.

Authors:  Shahrokh F Shariat; Jose A Karam; Yair Lotan; Pierre I Karakiewizc
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2008

Review 6.  Bladder tumor markers: from hematuria to molecular diagnostics--where do we stand?

Authors:  Samir P Shirodkar; Vinata B Lokeshwar
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 4.512

7.  [Secondary prevention after urological tumor diseases. Focusing on the kidneys, testes, and bladder].

Authors:  M J Mathers; D A Lazica; T Klotz; F Sommer; S Roth
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 8.  Alternatives to cytology in the management of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Gilad E Amiel; Tung Shu; Seth P Lerner
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2004-10

Review 9.  [Non-invasive urinary diagnosis of bladder cancer. What do we know?].

Authors:  I Kausch; A Böhle
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2003-04-11       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 10.  Urinary markers in screening patients with hematuria.

Authors:  Edmund Chiong; Kris E Gaston; H Barton Grossman
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.