BACKGROUND: Although perinuclear anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (p-ANCA) expression is strongly associated with ulcerative colitis, its relationship with the occurrence of pouchitis after restorative proctocolectomy is uncertain. METHODS: Serum p-ANCA was assayed using both indirect immunofluorescence and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in 49 patients, of whom 25 had, and 24 had not, developed pouchitis. Control sera were obtained from 15 healthy volunteers. RESULTS: By means of indirect immunofluorescence, p-ANCA was detected in 45.8% of patients without and in 48% with pouchitis (NS). Twenty-three (46.9%) of the 49 colitis patients were p-ANCA-positive, compared with none of the 15 controls (P < 0.01). By means of ELISA, p-ANCA positivity was present in 50% of patients without and in 68% with pouchitis (NS). CONCLUSION: Whereas p-ANCA was associated with ulcerative colitis as compared with normal individuals, it was not associated with pouchitis. Thus it is unlikely to be a suitable pre-operative marker to identify those patients who will develop pouchitis.
BACKGROUND: Although perinuclear anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (p-ANCA) expression is strongly associated with ulcerative colitis, its relationship with the occurrence of pouchitis after restorative proctocolectomy is uncertain. METHODS: Serum p-ANCA was assayed using both indirect immunofluorescence and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in 49 patients, of whom 25 had, and 24 had not, developed pouchitis. Control sera were obtained from 15 healthy volunteers. RESULTS: By means of indirect immunofluorescence, p-ANCA was detected in 45.8% of patients without and in 48% with pouchitis (NS). Twenty-three (46.9%) of the 49 colitispatients were p-ANCA-positive, compared with none of the 15 controls (P < 0.01). By means of ELISA, p-ANCA positivity was present in 50% of patients without and in 68% with pouchitis (NS). CONCLUSION: Whereas p-ANCA was associated with ulcerative colitis as compared with normal individuals, it was not associated with pouchitis. Thus it is unlikely to be a suitable pre-operative marker to identify those patients who will develop pouchitis.
Authors: Jennifer A Coukos; Lauren A Howard; Janice M Weinberg; James M Becker; Arthur F Stucchi; Francis A Farraye Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2012-02-07 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: Robert G Maunder; Gordon R Greenberg; Jonathan J Hunter; William J Lancee; A Hillary Steinhart; Mark S Silverberg Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2006-10-04 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Leandro Minatel Vidal de Negreiros; Lívia Bitencourt Pascoal; Lívia Moreira Genaro; Julian Furtado Silva; Bruno Lima Rodrigues; Michel Gardere Camargo; Carlos Augusto Real Martinez; Cláudio Saddy Rodrigues Coy; Maria de Lourdes Setsuko Ayrizono; João José Fagundes; Raquel Franco Leal Journal: Am J Transl Res Date: 2022-07-15 Impact factor: 3.940
Authors: P R Fleshner; E A Vasiliauskas; L Y Kam; N E Fleshner; J Gaiennie; M T Abreu-Martin; S R Targan Journal: Gut Date: 2001-11 Impact factor: 23.059