Literature DB >> 9648870

Distinct differences between morphine- and [D-Ala2,N-MePhe4,Gly-ol5]-enkephalin-mu-opioid receptor complexes demonstrated by cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase phosphorylation.

S Chakrabarti1, P Y Law, H H Loh.   

Abstract

The present study demonstrates a conditional, agonist-dependent phosphorylation of the mu-opioid receptor (MOR-1) by cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) in membrane preparations of MOR-1-transfected neuroblastoma Neuro2A cells. Opioid agonist-dependent phosphorylation occurs in a time- and concentration-dependent manner (EC50 approximately 40 nM) and can be abolished by the receptor antagonist naloxone. Stoichiometric analysis indicates incorporation of a maximum of 6 mol of phosphate/mol of receptor in the presence of 1 microM morphine and 6 nM PKA. Although morphine and related alkaloids as well as some peptide agonists (PLO17 and beta-endorphin) stimulated phosphorylation of MOR-1 by PKA, the potent mu-opioid-selective peptide [D-Ala2,N-MePhe4,Gly-ol5]-enkephalin (DAMGO) or other enkephalin analogues such as [D-Ala2]-Met5-enkephalinamide (DALA), [D-Ala2,D-Leu5]-enkephalin (DADLE), and Met5-enkephalin had no effect. The lack of the effect of DAMGO on MOR-1 phosphorylation state was evident also after chronic pretreatment. These results suggest the existence of different agonist-dependent conformations of MOR-1. Furthermore, phosphorylation may be a useful parameter with which to identify different agonist-receptor conformations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9648870     DOI: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1998.71010231.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurochem        ISSN: 0022-3042            Impact factor:   5.372


  9 in total

Review 1.  Post-transcriptional regulation of opioid receptors in the nervous system.

Authors:  Li-Na Wei; Ping-Yee Law; Horace H Loh
Journal:  Front Biosci       Date:  2004-05-01

Review 2.  Mu-opioid receptor desensitization: is morphine different?

Authors:  Mark Connor; Peregrine B Osborne; MacDonald J Christie
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2004-10-25       Impact factor: 8.739

3.  Differential effects of opioid agonists on G protein expression in CHO cells expressing cloned human opioid receptors.

Authors:  Heng Xu; Xiaoying Wang; John S Partilla; Kristen Bishop-Mathis; Tova S Benaderet; Christina M Dersch; Denise S Simpson; Thomas E Prisinzano; Richard B Rothman
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  2008-06-04       Impact factor: 4.077

4.  The mu-opioid receptor and the NMDA receptor associate in PAG neurons: implications in pain control.

Authors:  María Rodríguez-Muñoz; Pilar Sánchez-Blázquez; Ana Vicente-Sánchez; Esther Berrocoso; Javier Garzón
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 5.  Functional selectivity at the μ-opioid receptor: implications for understanding opioid analgesia and tolerance.

Authors:  Kirsten M Raehal; Cullen L Schmid; Chad E Groer; Laura M Bohn
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 25.468

6.  Cholesterol level influences opioid signaling in cell models and analgesia in mice and humans.

Authors:  Hui Zheng; Haibo Zou; Xiaopeng Liu; Ji Chu; Yali Zhou; Horace H Loh; Ping-Yee Law
Journal:  J Lipid Res       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 5.922

7.  Endomorphin-1 induced desensitization and down-regulation of the recombinant mu-opioid receptor.

Authors:  C Harrison; D J Rowbotham; D K Grandy; D G Lambert
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 8.739

8.  A new cytokine: the possible effect pathway of methionine enkephalin.

Authors:  Xin-Hua Liu; Dong-Ai Huang; Fei-Yi Yang; Yan-Sheng Hao; Guo-Guang Du; Ping-Feng Li; Gang Li
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  Dynamic Opioid Receptor Regulation in the Periphery.

Authors:  Nathaniel A Jeske
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 4.436

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.